BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

33 results for “reassessment”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi212Chennai42Mumbai39Jaipur34Amritsar33Kolkata13Nagpur13Hyderabad10Dehradun8Raipur7Indore6Agra4Ahmedabad4Lucknow3Jodhpur3Surat3Pune2Bangalore2

Key Topics

Section 14466Section 250(6)33Depreciation33Disallowance33Addition to Income33Natural Justice33

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 25/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Showing 1–20 of 33 · Page 1 of 2

ITA 26/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
09 Jun 2023
AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 27/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 33/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 34/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 58/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVTE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 59/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 63/ASR/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 64/ASR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 65/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 66/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 67/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 75/ASR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 76/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 77/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 78/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 79/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 80/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 16/ASR/2020[2001-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2001-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A

MEASAGE G.H AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,AMRITSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 17/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

260A of the IT Act by the Revenue. 33. The arguments, therefore, have been noted and from paragraphs 16, section 153A was analysed.” 7.2.1.5.Hon’bleSupreme Court of India Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Central-3v.AbhisarBuildwell (P.) Ltd, [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC) “11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A