BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “reassessment”+ Section 255(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi325Mumbai292Jaipur82Chennai69Bangalore62Chandigarh59Kolkata38Ahmedabad36Telangana27Hyderabad25Pune25Raipur21Allahabad20Guwahati17Cochin15Surat13Cuttack12Patna11Visakhapatnam10Amritsar10Jodhpur10Indore9Lucknow6Rajkot4Orissa4Karnataka4Ranchi3Kerala2Nagpur2Jabalpur2SC2J&K1Agra1Dehradun1Calcutta1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14712Reassessment9Section 1598Section 2558Section 1488Section 143(3)2Reopening of Assessment2

SH. SURINDER SINGH LEGAL HEIR. OF SMT SITA DEVI,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(1), BATHINDA

ITA 149/ASR/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Apr 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 147Section 159Section 255

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 of the Act, any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative and may be continued against the legal representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of death of the deceased. 4. It is clarified that the procedural

SHRI PURAN SINGH,SHAHKOT vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), LUDHIANA

ITA 267/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Girish Bali, CIT DR
Section 147Section 159Section 255

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 of the Act, any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative and may be continued against the legal representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of death of the deceased. 4. It is clarified that the procedural

SHRI PURAN SINGH,SHAHKOT vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), LUDHIANA

ITA 265/ASR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Girish Bali, CIT DR
Section 147Section 159Section 255

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 of the Act, any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative and may be continued against the legal representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of death of the deceased. 4. It is clarified that the procedural

SHRI PURAN SINGH ,SHAHKOT vs. PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER AOF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), LUDHIANA

ITA 261/ASR/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Mar 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Girish Bali, CIT DR
Section 147Section 159Section 255

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 of the Act, any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative and may be continued against the legal representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of death of the deceased. 4. It is clarified that the procedural

SHRI PURAN SINGH,SHAHKOT vs. PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) , LUDHIANA

ITA 266/ASR/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Girish Bali, CIT DR
Section 147Section 159Section 255

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 of the Act, any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative and may be continued against the legal representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of death of the deceased. 4. It is clarified that the procedural

SHRI PURAN SINGH ,SHAHKOT vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), LUDHIANA

ITA 262/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Mar 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Girish Bali, CIT DR
Section 147Section 159Section 255

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 of the Act, any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative and may be continued against the legal representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of death of the deceased. 4. It is clarified that the procedural

SHRI PURAN SINGH,SHAHKOT vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRJAL), LUDHIANA

ITA 264/ASR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Girish Bali, CIT DR
Section 147Section 159Section 255

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 of the Act, any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative and may be continued against the legal representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of death of the deceased. 4. It is clarified that the procedural

SHRI PURAN SINGH,SHAHKOT vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), LUDHIANA

ITA 263/ASR/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Mar 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Girish Bali, CIT DR
Section 147Section 159Section 255

reassessment or recomputation under section 147 of the Act, any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative and may be continued against the legal representative from the stage at which it stood on the date of death of the deceased. 4. It is clarified that the procedural

SH. VARINDER KUMAR SOUL,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(2), JALANDHAR

ITA 451/ASR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 451(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Pan: Cvips 5218R

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Ghulam Mustafa (D. R.)
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)

reassessment is not 'reason to suspect', but 'reason to believe', which is a more stringent condition and mandates the formation of belief on the strength of information or material in the possession of the Revenue leading to the said reason (refer: CIT v. Lakhmani Mewal Das [1976] 103ITR 437 (SC)). Section 143(2), per which the law provides

SHRI ARNESH KUMAR SHAKAR EX. MLA,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, DASUYA

In the result, appeal of the assessee ITA No

ITA 6/ASR/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Jul 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 54Section 54F

4. So with a view to comply with the above said directions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jalandhar approval may kindly be given to invoke the provisions of section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of assessment year 2010-11.” 5.1 Further, the ld. AR vehemently argued and placed that