Search: reassessment

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 246A(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Indore39 Delhi30 Mumbai29 Pune24 Panaji20 Chennai13 Raipur13 Jaipur12 Patna11 Kolkata11 Nagpur8 Chandigarh8 Cuttack6 Bangalore6 Amritsar4 Lucknow3 Visakhapatnam3 Jodhpur1 Hyderabad1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 14817 Section 1445 Cash Deposit4 Reopening of Assessment4 Addition to Income4 Section 2503 Section 1473 Section 23 Section 1393 Condonation of Delay

SHRI MOHAMMAD ABBAS ASHRAF,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 207/ASR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Sh. Yashender Garg, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 148Section 44A

reassessment order, stating that it was not tenable in law to frame an assessment based solely on the information of cash deposit. Without prejudice to the above, the assessee further submits as. Ground No 3:- 1 he appellate during the financial year 2011-12 has maintained two Bank accounts comprising of cash credits and Saving Bank accounts for carrying

SHRI MOHAMMAD ABBAS ASHRAF,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, SRINAGAR

SMT. BANI TREHAN,JAMMU vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMMU

SHRI MOHAMMAD ABBAS ASHRAF,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, SRINAGAR

SMT. BANI TREHAN,JAMMU vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMMU

SH. NIRBHAY TREHAN,JAMMU vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMMU

SH. NIRBHAY TREHAN,JAMMU vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMMU