BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 233clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi379Mumbai226Bangalore76Chandigarh36Chennai32Raipur31Kolkata26Patna24Jaipur22Lucknow21Ahmedabad18Nagpur11Cuttack10Indore9Cochin8Pune6Guwahati5Rajkot4Amritsar3Surat2Ranchi2Karnataka1Rajasthan1Hyderabad1SC1Jodhpur1Telangana1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 1479Section 1446Section 143(3)3Section 139(1)3Section 1323Section 80C3Section 683Deduction3Reopening of Assessment3Disallowance

SHRI ARUN NARULA,FROZEPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

ITA 12/ASR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 68Section 80C

reassess such income. Thus, the reason to believe escapement of income has necessarily to be that of the AO only and not of any other authority. In CIT vs. SFIL Stock Broking Ltd. (2010) 233 CTR (Del) 69: (2010) 41 DTR (Del) 98: (2010) 325 ITR 285 (Del) , it has been held, inter alia, that the AO cannot reopen

3
Addition to Income3
Natural Justice3

SHRI ARUN NARULA,FEROZEPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFD INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

ITA 13/ASR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 68Section 80C

reassess such income. Thus, the reason to believe escapement of income has necessarily to be that of the AO only and not of any other authority. In CIT vs. SFIL Stock Broking Ltd. (2010) 233 CTR (Del) 69: (2010) 41 DTR (Del) 98: (2010) 325 ITR 285 (Del) , it has been held, inter alia, that the AO cannot reopen

SHRI ARUN NARULA ,FEROZEPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

ITA 14/ASR/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 68Section 80C

reassess such income. Thus, the reason to believe escapement of income has necessarily to be that of the AO only and not of any other authority. In CIT vs. SFIL Stock Broking Ltd. (2010) 233 CTR (Del) 69: (2010) 41 DTR (Del) 98: (2010) 325 ITR 285 (Del) , it has been held, inter alia, that the AO cannot reopen