Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above
Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee
reassess such income. Thus, the reason to believe escapement of income has necessarily to be that of the AO only and not of any other authority. In CIT vs. SFIL Stock Broking Ltd. (2010) 233 CTR (Del) 69: (2010) 41 DTR (Del) 98: (2010) 325 ITR 285 (Del) , it has been held, inter alia, that the AO cannot reopen