BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi309Mumbai282Chennai107Ahmedabad71Bangalore68Jaipur48Chandigarh42Kolkata38Raipur37Pune27Nagpur26Hyderabad15Surat11Lucknow10Allahabad10Indore8Rajkot6Visakhapatnam5Karnataka5Jodhpur3Amritsar3SC3Telangana2Ranchi2Cuttack1Rajasthan1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 2638Section 1485Section 143(3)3Section 2502Section 1322Section 1472Addition to Income2Cash Deposit2

NASA AGRO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,FAZILKA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 236/ASR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Y. K. Sud & Sh. P. K. Anand, CAs
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153cSection 250

206 TTJ (Asr) 513 Karamjit Singh Rai vs ITO Reassessment-Reason to believe-Absence of material and rational belief-AO mainly relied upon information derived from AIR to the effect that assessee has purchased immovable property and reopened the assessment after recording the reason that the assessee failed to explain the source of investment in the property-Reasons recorded nowhere

MANDEEP SINGH S/O SH. NARINDER SINGH VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE TARMALA MALOUT DISTRICT MUKTSAR,MUKTSAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5) MUKTSAR JAO INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2) MUKTSAR, MUKTSAR

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 645/ASR/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Jun 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 282Section 69A

reassessment proceedings.” ii) Sh. Mohd Yousuf Wani vs. ITO in ITA No. 372/Asr/2009(Amritsar ITAT): I.T.A. No. 645/Asr/2024 10 Assessment Year: 2012-13 “ In our considered view, reliance placed by the A.O on the letter of Vigilance Department was not sufficient to make a belief that the income of the Assessee has escaped assessment. In the present case, the reason

SHRI SUKHJINDER SINGH,JALANDHAR vs. PRINICPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, JALANDHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 71/ASR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 263

206/- on various dates from M/s Rana Sugars Limited through NEFT and of course not in cash. This fact categorical establishes that the appellant was an agriculturist with sufficient 10 Sukhjinder Singh v. Pr. CIT agriculture income being earned from sale of agricultural produce including sugarcane. 9. Considering the appellants claim of the gross agriculture income of around