BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 164(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi352Mumbai254Chennai87Jaipur81Ahmedabad52Bangalore49Raipur44Kolkata37Chandigarh29Telangana28Ranchi25Lucknow25Pune17Guwahati15Indore14Nagpur13Patna13Surat10Cochin7Hyderabad6Allahabad6Orissa5Jodhpur4Dehradun4Rajkot4Rajasthan2Amritsar2Panaji2Karnataka2Visakhapatnam1Calcutta1Cuttack1SC1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 250(6)3Section 1473Section 1442Addition to Income2

SHRI GURBINDER SINGH MAHAL,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-IV ( 2), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 22/ASR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 144oSection 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 250o

164-167 stamp duty document no.A221692 29. Copy of Power of Attorney executed on 17.02.2012 by Sh. Harjit 48-54 Singh in favour of the appellant giving right- ‘to make any arrangement regarding property, remove illegal possession, make demarcation, take possession, to appear on behalf of father, to use/ dispose properties, and to act as custodian, etc. ‘ 30. Copy

MESERS SUPERTECH FORGINGS(INDIA) PVT.LTD.,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE IV, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 563/ASR/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar02 Aug 2021AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 147

reassessment proceedings for relevant year by recording reason that information so received needed to be examined and creditworthiness of assessee had to be proved beyond doubt to accept claim of its director that money seized infact belonged to assessee- company - Whether since 'reason to believe' recorded by Assessing Officer did not refer to any material that came to his knowledge