BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Section 160clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi433Mumbai326Chennai120Jaipur107Bangalore81Ahmedabad76Kolkata75Hyderabad65Raipur56Pune49Chandigarh38Allahabad30Cochin25Nagpur25Telangana25Indore20Lucknow18Agra12Rajkot12Cuttack11Panaji11Surat11Visakhapatnam10Ranchi9Dehradun9Amritsar5Patna4Guwahati4Jodhpur2Orissa2Rajasthan2SC2Uttarakhand1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 1477Section 686Section 250(6)5Section 1445Addition to Income5Section 1484Section 234B4Section 234B(3)4Section 249(4)(b)3Long Term Capital Gains

SHRI GURBINDER SINGH MAHAL,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-IV ( 2), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 22/ASR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 144oSection 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 250o

160 or ‘legal representative’ as per section 159. The text of section 159 is reproduced hereunder: - 159. (1) Where a person dies, his legal representative shall be liable to pay any sum which the deceased would have been liable to pay if he had not died, in the like manner and to the same extent as the deceased

THE BABA NAG RICE & GENRAL MILLS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRITSAR.

2
House Property2
Unexplained Money2

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 375/ASR/2016[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2018AY 1998-99

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 375/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 1998-99

For Appellant: Sh. Sudarshan Kapoor (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 234BSection 234B(1)Section 234B(3)Section 244A

reassessment, which therefore is a mistake apparent from record liable for rectification. Reliance is placed on the decision in Datamatics Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2008] 299 ITR (AT) 286 (Mum). The Revenue rebuts this, stating that the levy of interest u/s. 234B, i.e., toward shortfall in the advance-tax, reckoned with reference to the assessed tax – defined

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH, CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

ITA 347/ASR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 68

reassessment proceedings provided he has reasons to believe but the same cannot be taken recourse to on the basis of reasons to suspect-ITO & Ors, vs. Lakhmani Mewal Das 1976 CTR (SC) 220 (1976) 103 ITR 437 (SC) relied on". Therefore, the very assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 on the basis of the "reason" recorded is vitiated. Thus, the reasons

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH. CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

ITA 346/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 68

reassessment proceedings provided he has reasons to believe but the same cannot be taken recourse to on the basis of reasons to suspect-ITO & Ors, vs. Lakhmani Mewal Das 1976 CTR (SC) 220 (1976) 103 ITR 437 (SC) relied on". Therefore, the very assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 on the basis of the "reason" recorded is vitiated. Thus, the reasons

PIRTPAL SINGH BRAR,MUKTSAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), MUKTSAR, MUKTSAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 38/ASR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar18 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Khettra Mohan Roy

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, Adv. &
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 208Section 249Section 249(4)(b)Section 250Section 69

section 249 of the Act.” 8. Now, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal on the grounds contained in the memorandum of appeal. Referring to the paper book filed along with an application for admission of additional evidence under Rule 29 of ITAT Rules, 1963, the ld. AR submitted that agricultural income on sale of agricultural produce has been