BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

266 results for “reassessment”+ Section 14clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,592Mumbai3,881Chennai1,295Bangalore1,181Jaipur810Kolkata787Ahmedabad703Hyderabad680Pune466Raipur442Chandigarh370Surat316Indore285Amritsar266Visakhapatnam246Rajkot217Cochin214Cuttack184Karnataka134Nagpur132Patna115Agra113Guwahati103Lucknow98Telangana79Dehradun78Ranchi73Jodhpur52Allahabad52SC39Calcutta38Panaji32Rajasthan11Orissa10Jabalpur10Kerala7Varanasi6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Punjab & Haryana3Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2J&K1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income96Section 14888Section 153A86Section 14782Section 14459Section 26358Section 250(6)43Section 153D41Section 25038Natural Justice

SHRI HARSH VARDHAN ,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

ITA 308/ASR/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Sh. Nirmal Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Trilochan Singh PS Khalsa, DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

14. As per the sub-section (1) of section 282 thus, the service of notice or summons, etc. may be made by delivering or transmitting a copy to the person named, inter alia as per clause (a) by post or by such courier service as may be approved by the Board or in such manner as provided under the Code

M/S CITI PLAZA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 3(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Showing 1–20 of 266 · Page 1 of 14

...
33
Disallowance29
Depreciation27
ITA 356/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 147Section 148Section 250

14 (SC) wherein it was held thus: "Reassessment under s. 147(a)—Limitation—Scope and applicability of s. 153(3)(ii)—A finding' for purposes of s. 153(3)(ii) must be a finding necessary, and not incidental, for the disposal of the particular case, in respect of particular assessee and in relation to the particular assessment year

SAINIK CO OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED,JAMMU AND KASHMIR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAMMU, JAMMU

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed on the legal issue as indicated above

ITA 698/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar08 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 698/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69A

reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s Section 144B of the Act dated 29.05.2023 also deserve to be quashed. Decided in favour of the assessee. 2025 (6) TMI 1230 - GUJARAT HIGH CQURT, KRISHNA NAITIK PATEL PQA HOLDER OF ISHWERBHAI KESHAVBHAI PATEL VERSUS ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT & ANR Reopening of assessment - Period of limitation under new tax regime - validity

SHRI BALJINDER SINGH ,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 148/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. J. K. Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 69A

section 147 of the act. Thus, ground numbers 3, 5 and 6 of the appellant assessee are rejected. 12. In ground No. 7 to 10 the appellant challenged that the amount deposited was out of sale proceeds of Agricultural land of HUF and the AO has committed an error in reopening the case of individuals/appellant and hence the reassessment

SHRIMATI MANJIT KAUR,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 (1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 147/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. J. K. Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 69A

section 147 of the act. Thus, ground numbers 3, 5 and 6 of the appellant assessee are rejected. 12. In ground No. 7 to 10 the appellant challenged that the amount deposited was out of sale proceeds of Agricultural land of HUF and the AO has committed an error in reopening the case of individuals/appellant and hence the reassessment

SHRIMATI AMARJIT KAUR W/O BUGAR SINGH,MANSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4), MANSA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 251(2)Section 49

reassessment proceedings, the statutory notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was issued on 22 March 2016 which was received back with postal comments refused. Subsequently the official of the department was sent on 14

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 78/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 77/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 79/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 27/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 33/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 34/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 58/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 26/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 75/ASR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 65/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 64/ASR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 25/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 66/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 63/ASR/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

14. In view of the above and for the reasons statedabove, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 orrequisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes thejurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall standabated; I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 37 &33 Others iii) in case any incriminating material isfound/unearthed, even