BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 124clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi326Mumbai158Hyderabad121Chennai78Ahmedabad68Bangalore66Jaipur66Raipur54Chandigarh44Rajkot33Pune22Allahabad22Kolkata21Visakhapatnam19Indore19Cochin18Ranchi18Jodhpur11Surat11Agra11Lucknow6Guwahati5Patna5Cuttack5Amritsar4Nagpur2Panaji2Dehradun2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 14812Section 1475Section 2634Section 143(3)4Reassessment4Section 1443Reopening of Assessment3Cash Deposit3Section 250(6)2Section 68

SH. FARUKH JEHAN ZEB ,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ANANT NAG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 444/ASR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar03 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Touseef Ahmad Khanday &For Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 68

section 147 of Income Tax Act. The observation of the AO that all cash deposits in the bank account may not be the income of the assessee and therefore any assumption that it has escaped assessment would be fallacious has to also at the same time need to be considered from the viewpoint that if a large cash has been

2
Addition to Income2

ZOYIEB ALI,SRINAGAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, SRINAGAR

In the result the captioned appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 687/ASR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lalmeena, Hon'Ble & Shri Udayan Das Gupta, Hon'Bleincome Tax Officer, Zoyieb Ali Ward-1 170 A, Green Park Lane Bye Pass, Near Jamkash, Srinagar Kapurthala Pan:Akapa2889F Shri Rohit Kapoor, Advocate & Assessee By Shri V.S. Aggarwal, Itp Shri Charan Dass, Sr. Dr Revenue By 23.09.2025. Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement /A // .2025. Order Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, A.M.:

Section 124Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250(6)

reassessment proceedings unsustainable in law. 4. That the LD CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs.38,13,839/- made by the AO ignoring the fact that the assessment framed u/s 144/147 is bad in law since the same is without mentioning DIN which is mandatory requirement as per circular no. 19/2019 dated 14 Aug 2019. That

SHRI IQBAL SHEIKH,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICEER , SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 176/ASR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Upender Bhat, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Mohit Kumar Nigam, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 2

124 taxmann.com 516 (Madras) has observed that the Tribunal was right in quashing reassessment proceedings by Assessing Officer on ground that reasons for reopening were not communicated to assessee and despite opportunities, revenue was not able to produce any evidence to show that reasons recorded for reopening had been provided to assessee as requested by them in their letter vide

SHRI KULDIP SINGH,KAPURTHALA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, JALANDHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 38/ASR/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

reassessment proceedings, while accepting cash deposited in bank as trading transactions to assess net profit thereon, and therefore the ld. PCIT erred in setting aside the order simply proposing roving enquiries in mechanical manner ignoring the reply filed against shows cause notice. He pleaded that this order is wholly illegal and unsustainable in law. 6. The Ld. CIT (DR) stands