M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

reassessment proceedings, the assessee has again filed the third application for registration under section 12A on 5-11-2014 along with the resolution passed by the Execute Council of the University approving certain amendments to the VTU Act, as desired by the CIT. However, the CIT insisted on production of the amendments enacted by the state legislature. According

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

reassessment proceedings, the assessee has again filed the third application for registration under section 12A on 5-11-2014 along with the resolution passed by the Execute Council of the University approving certain amendments to the VTU Act, as desired by the CIT. However, the CIT insisted on production of the amendments enacted by the state legislature. According

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

reassessment proceedings, the assessee has again filed the third application for registration under section 12A on 5-11-2014 along with the resolution passed by the Execute Council of the University approving certain amendments to the VTU Act, as desired by the CIT. However, the CIT insisted on production of the amendments enacted by the state legislature. According

M/S SHYMA LAL THAPAR FOUNDATION,MOGA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICERII, MOGA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 644/(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 2010-11 I.T.A. No. 592/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10

reassessment, held the same to be covered within the purview of the first proviso to section 12A(2). Coming back to our discussion as to the purpose/reason/s for the stipulation of the condition of the pendency of the assessment proceedings before the AO, i.e., which inform the same, it is again the AO who has to be given the notice

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR vs. DR SHYAM LAL THAPAR NURSING HOME, MOGA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 644/(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 2010-11 I.T.A. No. 592/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10

reassessment, held the same to be covered within the purview of the first proviso to section 12A(2). Coming back to our discussion as to the purpose/reason/s for the stipulation of the condition of the pendency of the assessment proceedings before the AO, i.e., which inform the same, it is again the AO who has to be given the notice

M/S. SHYAM LAL THAPAR FOUNDATION,MOGA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER_II,, MOGA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 644/(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 2010-11 I.T.A. No. 592/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10

reassessment, held the same to be covered within the purview of the first proviso to section 12A(2). Coming back to our discussion as to the purpose/reason/s for the stipulation of the condition of the pendency of the assessment proceedings before the AO, i.e., which inform the same, it is again the AO who has to be given the notice

SHRI HARSH VARDHAN ,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

2) of Section 22 and may proceed to reassess such income, profits or gains". The argument is that the service of the requisite notice on the assessee is a condition precedent to the validity of any reassessment made under Section 34; and if a valid notice is not issued as required, proceedings taken by the Income Tax Officer in pursuance

M/S CITI PLAZA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 3(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

2) of section 150, however, makes it clear that reassessment permissible under sub-section (1) of section 150 would not be available to the Department where the period of limitation for such assessment or reassessment has expired at the time it is proposed to be reopened. In sub-section (1) of section 150 by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment