M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

reassessment proceedings, the assessee has again filed the third application for registration under section 12A on 5-11-2014 along with the resolution passed by the Execute Council of the University approving certain amendments to the VTU Act, as desired by the CIT. However, the CIT insisted on production of the amendments enacted by the state legislature. According

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

reassessment proceedings, the assessee has again filed the third application for registration under section 12A on 5-11-2014 along with the resolution passed by the Execute Council of the University approving certain amendments to the VTU Act, as desired by the CIT. However, the CIT insisted on production of the amendments enacted by the state legislature. According

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

reassessment proceedings, the assessee has again filed the third application for registration under section 12A on 5-11-2014 along with the resolution passed by the Execute Council of the University approving certain amendments to the VTU Act, as desired by the CIT. However, the CIT insisted on production of the amendments enacted by the state legislature. According

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR vs. DR SHYAM LAL THAPAR NURSING HOME, MOGA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 644/(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 2010-11 I.T.A. No. 592/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10

11 read with sections 12 and 13, including as to its’ quantification. It has nothing to do with the time lag between the year for which the assessment proceedings are pending before the AO and the time (year) of the grant of registration u/s. 12AA. That is, there is no correlation, much less a linear relationship, between the two defined

M/S. SHYAM LAL THAPAR FOUNDATION,MOGA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER_II,, MOGA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 644/(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 2010-11 I.T.A. No. 592/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10

11 read with sections 12 and 13, including as to its’ quantification. It has nothing to do with the time lag between the year for which the assessment proceedings are pending before the AO and the time (year) of the grant of registration u/s. 12AA. That is, there is no correlation, much less a linear relationship, between the two defined

M/S SHYMA LAL THAPAR FOUNDATION,MOGA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICERII, MOGA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 644/(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 2010-11 I.T.A. No. 592/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2009-10

11 read with sections 12 and 13, including as to its’ quantification. It has nothing to do with the time lag between the year for which the assessment proceedings are pending before the AO and the time (year) of the grant of registration u/s. 12AA. That is, there is no correlation, much less a linear relationship, between the two defined

SHRI HARSH VARDHAN ,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

reassessment can be assumed. The marginal note of this section reads, "Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment". Section 149 provides for issuance of notice before the expiry of the prescribed period and the marginal note of this section reads: "Time limit for notice". In our opinion, therefore, these words, "service of notice" or "issuance of notice", have

M/S CITI PLAZA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 3(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

reassessment proceedings under the provisions of section 149 of the Act." (p. 776) I.T.A. No. 356/Asr/2017 20 Assessment Year: 2006-07 ITAT KOLKATA BENCH-C ITO vs. Sri Biswajit Chatterjee ITA No. 565/Kol/2013 dated 10.11.2017.The relevant paragraphs are reproduced as below: - “11

SAINIK CO OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED,JAMMU AND KASHMIR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAMMU, JAMMU

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed on the legal issue as indicated above

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 698/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14

Reassessment) - Assessment year 2013-14 - Assessee-company filed instant writ on ground that a notice dated 01- 06-2021 issued under section 148 and notice under section 148A(b) I.T.A. No. 698/Asr/2024 11

SHRIMATI MANJIT KAUR,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 (1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 292 BB of Income Tax Act. The appellant not only participated in the assessment proceedings but also adduced evidence in support of the contentions on merit. No objection was taken to the reassessment proceedings. The contention of the appellant that the objections can be filed at the state of appeal also for the first time lacks merit because

SHRI BALJINDER SINGH ,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 292 BB of Income Tax Act. The appellant not only participated in the assessment proceedings but also adduced evidence in support of the contentions on merit. No objection was taken to the reassessment proceedings. The contention of the appellant that the objections can be filed at the state of appeal also for the first time lacks merit because

SHRIMATI AMARJIT KAUR W/O BUGAR SINGH,MANSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(4), MANSA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

reassessment proceedings as has been elaborated the explained by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO & Ors. (2003) 179 CTR (SC) 11 : (2003) 259 ITR 19 (SC) where it has categorically been held that in the light of objections filed by the assessee, the Assessing Officer would pass a detailed order

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11. As per the provisions of Section 153A, in case of asearch under Section 132 or requisition under Section132A, the AO gets the jurisdiction to assess or reassessthe ‘total income’ in respect of each assessment yearfalling within six assessment years. However, it isrequired to be noted that as per the second proviso toSection 153A, the assessment or re-assessment