BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai297Delhi93Kolkata83Jaipur81Ahmedabad73Chandigarh36Guwahati31Surat21Bangalore20Indore19Pune18Chennai17Rajkot13Lucknow13Hyderabad13Ranchi12Raipur10Patna7Visakhapatnam5Amritsar5Cuttack5Nagpur3Jodhpur3Calcutta3Agra2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 686Addition to Income5Section 1474Section 143(3)4Section 132(4)4Section 250(6)2Section 1442Section 144r2Long Term Capital Gains

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH, CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

ITA 347/ASR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 68

penny stock and has weak financial position, suspicious pattern of rigging of share prices and stands debarred/suspended from share market as per the order of the SEBI. Further, there is no evidential change in performance of the company which would substantiate the price rise of the scrip. The persons selling the scrip when the price of scrip is high

2
House Property2
Unexplained Money2

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH. CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

ITA 346/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 68

penny stock and has weak financial position, suspicious pattern of rigging of share prices and stands debarred/suspended from share market as per the order of the SEBI. Further, there is no evidential change in performance of the company which would substantiate the price rise of the scrip. The persons selling the scrip when the price of scrip is high

POONAM MARWAHA,AMRITSAR vs. ACIT DCIT CEN CIR, AMRITSAR

ITA 306/ASR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Vikram Singh Yadav & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 44ASection 69

Penny stock shares) - Assessment year 2014- 15 - Whether before exercise of power under section 263 it is Principal Commissioner who has to apply its mind to issue and thereafter record reasons as to how twin conditions of order of Assessing Officer being erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue are satisfied and then issue a show-cause notice to assessee

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PRIVATE LIMITED, TARN TARAN

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and

ITA 45/ASR/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Jatinder Nagpal, Adv. & Sh. Nimish Nagpal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rohit Mehra, CIT DR
Section 132(4)

penny in cash in lieu of cheque issued for payment were withdrawn/received by the appellant by any manner. It is also submitted that it was explained that 90% of the sales of the appellant concern are exports only and none of the sales were doubted or doubtful. Moreover, no discrepancy was found in stock in any of the year including

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PRIVATE LIMITED , TARN TARAN

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and

ITA 44/ASR/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Jatinder Nagpal, Adv. & Sh. Nimish Nagpal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rohit Mehra, CIT DR
Section 132(4)

penny in cash in lieu of cheque issued for payment were withdrawn/received by the appellant by any manner. It is also submitted that it was explained that 90% of the sales of the appellant concern are exports only and none of the sales were doubted or doubtful. Moreover, no discrepancy was found in stock in any of the year including