Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi56 Mumbai54 Bangalore27 Ahmedabad17 Jaipur15 Hyderabad13 Lucknow11 Kolkata11 Pune10 Indore6 Jodhpur3 Amritsar3 Ranchi3 Raipur2 Cochin2 Chandigarh1 Rajkot1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6 Section 1544 Section 143(3)3 Penalty3 Section 50C2 Section 2502 Long Term Capital Gains2 Short Term Capital Gains2 Deduction

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 548/ASR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 548/(Asr)/2016 Assessment Year: 2009-10

For Appellant: Sh. Tarun Bansal (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)

Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

u/s. 80G - which the AO may verify for its authenticity, the AO shall compute the tax sought to be evaded under Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c) by reckoning the tax rebate as applicable to a section 80G donation. We decide accordingly. The third and final disallowance qua which the penalty

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT