Search: penalty u/s 271

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1478 Section 1488 Addition to Income6 Penalty5 Section 250(6)4 Section 143(3)4 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 2824 Section 151

M/S J. P. INDUSTRIES ,JALALABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - II, BATHINDA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 212/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)Section 282Section 69C

section 282 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts and law in confirming the validity of the proceedings initiated by the AO u/s 147/148 because no proper satisfaction as prescribed u/s 151 was recorded by the Pr. CIT that the case of the assessee was fit for issue of notice u/s 148. I.T.A

M/S J. P. INDUSTRIES ,JALALABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - II, BATHINDA

M/S J. P. INDUSTRIES ,JALALABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - II, BATHINDA

MESERS J.P INDUSTRIES,JALALABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

MEASAGE J.P. INDUSTRIES.,JALALABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

M/S J P INDUSTRIES,JALABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - II, BATHINDA

MILLENNIUM REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

SH. JOGESH CHANDER GUPTA,PHAGWARA vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PHAGWARA