Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai62 Delhi54 Ahmedabad23 Chennai20 Jaipur20 Indore13 Pune11 Bangalore10 Surat7 Patna6 Kolkata6 Agra5 Raipur5 Chandigarh4 Amritsar4 Lucknow4 Visakhapatnam3 Hyderabad3 Nagpur3 Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)7 Section 143(3)4 Section 2634 Penalty4 Section 271(1)2 Section 1472 Section 1682 Section 2742 Condonation of Delay

SMT. JANAK RANI DHINGRA,HARYANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, MOGA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 294/ASR/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar12 Feb 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi. T. A. No. 294/(Asr)/2016 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. P.N. Arora, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Bhawani Shankar, DR

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 54Section 54F

54F of the Act are allowable to the Assessee only on construction or purchase of new residential house, therefore, he made additon of Rs. 4,40,000/- disallowing the deduction of Long Term Capital Gains from sale of residential house as declared by the Assessee. Thereafter, the AO levied penalty u/s 271

SMT. JANAK RANI DHINGRA,HARYANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, MOGA

SMT. JANAK RANI DHINGRA,HARYANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, MOGA

ESTATE OF SH. JAGIR SINGH BHULLAR,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TARN TARAN

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TARN TARAN vs. ESTATE OF LATE SH. JAGIR SINGH BHULLAR, TARN TARAN

SH. RAGHUNATH SAHAI PURI(DECD),PATHANKOT vs. THE DEPTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATHANKOT