Search: penalty u/s 271

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 40A(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 1476 Section 1486 Section 143(3)6 Addition to Income6 Section 2823 Section 1513 Section 145(3)3 Section 250

M/S SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

In the result, the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 214/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kalia, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rajiv Wadhera, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 271(1)(c)Section 282

40A(3) of the Act. Hence for the above reasons, proceedings u/s 147 of the Act were initiated and issued notice u/s 148 of the Act. Being not satisfied with the reply of the assessee, the AO made an addition of Rs.79,51,206/- being the alleged undisclosed profit and Rs. 50,00,000/- unexplained initial investment

M/S SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

M/S SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

MEASAGE. SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS,JALALABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

MEASEG. SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

SHRIMATI BANEET KAUR BHASIN,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(1), JALANDHAR

SMT. BANEET KAUR BHASIN,,JALANDHAR vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, JALANDHAR

THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, JALANDHAR vs. SMT. BANEET KAUR BHASIN,, JALANDHAR