Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 292Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai79 Delhi66 Bangalore40 Chandigarh16 Rajkot10 Pune10 Jaipur9 Kolkata9 Chennai8 Nagpur6 Jabalpur5 Indore3 Visakhapatnam2 Ahmedabad2 Amritsar2 Cochin2 Hyderabad2 Lucknow2 Patna2 Surat1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 14812 Section 1476 Section 2502 Section 144a2 Section 1512 Section 682 Section 1442 Cash Deposit2 Reopening of Assessment

SHRI JASHANDEEP SINGH SIDHU,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (3), BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 11/ASR/2023[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 144aSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 68

271(1)(c) of the Act. I.T.A. No. 310/Asr/2019 2 & ITA No.11/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2010-11 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds: “1. The ld. CIT(A) erred on facts and law by upholding the validity of service of notice was neither received by the assessee (as he was living in Canada during the said period

SHRI JASHANDEEP SINGH SIDHU,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (3), BATHINDA

SHRI JASHANDEEP SINGH SIDHU,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (3), BATHINDA

SHRI JASHANDEEP SINGH SIDHU,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(3), BATHINDA