BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 27lclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi64Mumbai24Ahmedabad13Bangalore12Chandigarh10Kolkata3Cuttack2Amritsar2Raipur2SC1Cochin1Indore1Patna1Rajasthan1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)11Section 2745Section 250(6)2Section 143(3)2Penalty2

SHRI RAJINDER KUMAR SHARMA,UDHAMPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICEER WARD-2(4), UDHAMPUR

In the result, the ITA 175/Asr/2019 is allowed

ITA 175/ASR/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 27l(1)(c)

27l(1)(c) for concealment of income/ furnishing inaccurate particulars of income are being initiated' separately.” 6. The ld. Sr. DR vehemently argued and relied on the order of the ld. CIT(A). But he had not made any strong objection against the assessee’s plea. 7. We heard the rival submission and considered the documents available in the record

SHRI KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA ,FAZILKA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(4), ABOHAR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 14/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. J. K. Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Manpreet Singh Duggal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 139(2)Section 142Section 143(3)Section 22Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 27l

section 27l. (BRIJ LAL) Income Tax Officer Ward-II(4), Abohar 3. The ld. DR vehemently argued and relied on the order of the ld. CIT(A). The ld. DR further mentioned that in the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) dated 17.02.2016 by the ld. AO. The ld. AO specifically mentioned that the penalty proceedings u/s 271