Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 273clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 12715 Section 246A6 Section 1436 Section 143(3)5 Section 44A5 Section 271(1)(c)3 Section 271B3 Section 2713 Addition to Income

SHRI H.K. GANDOTRA,GURGAON vs. THE INOCME-TAX OFFICER, JAMMU

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 594/ASR/2014[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jun 2019AY 1997-98

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. No. 594/Asr/2014 Assessment Year: 1997-98

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)

Section 143(3)Section 246Section 271(1)(c)Section 275

section 271(1)(c) deems a person to have concealed the particulars of his income where he is unable to furnish an explanation, or substantiate that furnished, with all the facts relevant and material to the computation of his income, or the explanation furnished is found false. The said Explanation 1 is, as would be apparent from a bare reading

SHRI H.K. GANDOTRA,GURGAON vs. THE INOCME-TAX OFFICER, JAMMU

SHRI H.K. GANDOTRA,GURGAON vs. THE INOCME-TAX OFFICER, JAMMU

THE HALDHAR FOODS(P) LTD.,FEROZPUR CANTT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-III(5), FEROZPUR

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

SH GAUTAM SETH,BATALA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, BATALA

SATNAM SINGH MEMORIAL TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE WARD-III(2), JALANDHAR