BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi64Indore52Jaipur42Hyderabad24Mumbai23Chennai22Pune20Bangalore16Visakhapatnam13Cochin10Ahmedabad7Rajkot6Kolkata5Nagpur4Chandigarh2Raipur2Amritsar2Jodhpur2Cuttack2Guwahati1Surat1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 269S12Section 271D6Section 274Section 269T2Section 143(3)2Penalty2Addition to Income2

SHRI BALBIR SINGH M/S JAIDEEP GIFT CENTRE, TAPTEJ SINGH MARKET ,MOGA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MOGA RANGE , MOGA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 745/ASR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar18 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Radhey Shyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 269TSection 27Section 271D

271E. While rejecting assessee plea the Ld ADD! CIT did not considered the facts that the transaction of Rs. 20.00 Lakh was a genuine transaction made out of directors current account maintained with the company, which is out of the purview of the provisions of section 269SS and 269TT of the Act. Further the transaction w'as made

SHRI BALBIR SINGH M/S JAIDEEP GIFT CENTRE TAPTEJ SINGH MARKET,MOGA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MOGA RANGE MOGA, MOGA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 746/ASR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar18 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Radhey Shyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 269TSection 27Section 271D

271E. While rejecting assessee plea the Ld ADD! CIT did not considered the facts that the transaction of Rs. 20.00 Lakh was a genuine transaction made out of directors current account maintained with the company, which is out of the purview of the provisions of section 269SS and 269TT of the Act. Further the transaction w'as made