BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi44Jaipur35Indore25Hyderabad23Pune16Chennai14Mumbai13Bangalore7Cochin6Ahmedabad4Kolkata4Lucknow3Cuttack2Chandigarh2Nagpur2Amritsar2Jodhpur1Visakhapatnam1Rajkot1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 269S12Section 271D6Section 274Section 269T2Section 143(3)2Penalty2Addition to Income2

SHRI BALBIR SINGH M/S JAIDEEP GIFT CENTRE, TAPTEJ SINGH MARKET ,MOGA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MOGA RANGE , MOGA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 745/ASR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar18 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Radhey Shyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 269TSection 27Section 271D

269T. It is rightly held by Madras High Court in the case of CIT V. Idhayam Publications Ltd., (2006) 285 ITR 221 (Mad) "In this case there was a current account in the books of the assessee in the name of the one of the directors who used to pay money into the current account and also withdraw money from

SHRI BALBIR SINGH M/S JAIDEEP GIFT CENTRE TAPTEJ SINGH MARKET,MOGA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MOGA RANGE MOGA, MOGA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 746/ASR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar18 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Radhey Shyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 269TSection 27Section 271D

269T. It is rightly held by Madras High Court in the case of CIT V. Idhayam Publications Ltd., (2006) 285 ITR 221 (Mad) "In this case there was a current account in the books of the assessee in the name of the one of the directors who used to pay money into the current account and also withdraw money from