Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 1476 Section 1486 Section 2823 Section 1513 Section 143(3)3 Section 145(3)3 Penalty3 Addition to Income

M/S SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

In the result, the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 214/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kalia, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rajiv Wadhera, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 271(1)(c)Section 282

section 282 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts and law in confirming the validity of the proceedings initiated by the AO u/s 147/148 because no proper satisfaction as prescribed u/s 151 was recorded by the Pr. CIT that the case of the assessee was fit for issue of notice u/s

M/S SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

M/S SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

MEASEG. SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

MEASAGE. SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS,JALALABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA