Search: penalty u/s 271 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi116 Mumbai92 Allahabad37 Bangalore31 Jaipur28 Chandigarh27 Pune19 Chennai17 Guwahati14 Hyderabad8 Amritsar7 Raipur6 Indore6 Nagpur6 Rajkot5 Dehradun5 Patna4 Lucknow3 Surat1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)30 Section 153D21 Section 27113 Penalty7 Addition to Income7 Section 250(6)6 Section 276 Section 271A4 Section 153A2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI MADAN LAL, SHAHKOT

In the result, the appeals of the revenue bearing ITA Nos

ITA 28/ASR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153DSection 250(6)Section 27Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153D of the Act. The penalty order U/s 271(1)(c) was framed by the ld AO. The penalty

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI MADAN LAL, SHAHKOT

In the result, the appeals of the revenue bearing ITA Nos

ITA 26/ASR/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153DSection 250(6)Section 27Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153D of the Act. The penalty order U/s 271(1)(c) was framed by the ld AO. The penalty

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI MADAN LAL, SHAHKOT

In the result, the appeals of the revenue bearing ITA Nos

ITA 27/ASR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153DSection 250(6)Section 27Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153D of the Act. The penalty order U/s 271(1)(c) was framed by the ld AO. The penalty

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI MADAN LAL, SHAHKOT

In the result, the appeals of the revenue bearing ITA Nos

ITA 25/ASR/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jul 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153DSection 250(6)Section 27Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153D of the Act. The penalty order U/s 271(1)(c) was framed by the ld AO. The penalty

INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS) -1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI MADAN LAL, SHAHKOT

In the result, the appeals of the revenue bearing ITA Nos

ITA 24/ASR/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153DSection 250(6)Section 27Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153D of the Act. The penalty order U/s 271(1)(c) was framed by the ld AO. The penalty

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI MADAN LAL, SHAHKOT

In the result, the appeals of the revenue bearing ITA Nos

ITA 23/ASR/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jul 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153DSection 250(6)Section 27Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153D of the Act. The penalty order U/s 271(1)(c) was framed by the ld AO. The penalty

SHRI DARSHAN PAL SINGH GAREWAL,LUDHIANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 389/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar18 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Smt. Ratinder Kaur, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 153DSection 271Section 271A

271 as envisaged under the Income Tax Act. 1961. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO in passing the impugned assessment order u/s 271AAB without considering the submissions of the assessee and without observing the principles of natural