Search: penalty u/s 271 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi218 Mumbai192 Chennai79 Jaipur71 Bangalore59 Allahabad37 Ahmedabad34 Pune34 Surat33 Hyderabad29 Rajkot21 Chandigarh18 Indore18 Panaji10 Nagpur8 Lucknow8 Amritsar7 Patna7 Dehradun7 Visakhapatnam5 Guwahati5 Kolkata5 Raipur5 Agra2 Cochin2 Jabalpur2 Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 153C60 Section 13212 Section 153A12 Section 271F7 Penalty7 Section 271(1)(c)6 Section 1442 Section 1482

SHRI PAWAN KUMAR ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the bunch of appeals are allowed

ITA 16/ASR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar23 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Digvijai Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(l)(c) and 270A on the ground that the AO has rightly framed the assessment u/s 153C. The CIT(A) has mentioned that the section

SHRI PAWAN KUMAR,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the bunch of appeals are allowed

ITA 17/ASR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar23 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Digvijai Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(l)(c) and 270A on the ground that the AO has rightly framed the assessment u/s 153C. The CIT(A) has mentioned that the section

SHRI PAWAN KUMAR,JALANDHAR CANTT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the bunch of appeals are allowed

ITA 18/ASR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar23 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Digvijai Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(l)(c) and 270A on the ground that the AO has rightly framed the assessment u/s 153C. The CIT(A) has mentioned that the section

SHRI PAWAN KUMAR,JALANDHAR CANTT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the bunch of appeals are allowed

ITA 19/ASR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar23 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Digvijai Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(l)(c) and 270A on the ground that the AO has rightly framed the assessment u/s 153C. The CIT(A) has mentioned that the section

SHRI PAWAN KUMAR,JALANDHAR CANTT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the bunch of appeals are allowed

ITA 20/ASR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar23 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Digvijai Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(l)(c) and 270A on the ground that the AO has rightly framed the assessment u/s 153C. The CIT(A) has mentioned that the section

SHRI PAWAN KUMAR,JALANDHAR CANTT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the bunch of appeals are allowed

ITA 21/ASR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar23 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Digvijai Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(l)(c) and 270A on the ground that the AO has rightly framed the assessment u/s 153C. The CIT(A) has mentioned that the section

SMT. PRITPAL KAUR,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(3), JALANDHAR

ITA 59/ASR/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Mohit Kumar Nigam, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 148Section 2Section 271F

153C, penalty for failure to furnish the return of income cannot be levied under s. 271F. He pleaded that prior to the omission of s. 271(l)(a) by the Direct Tax Laws Act, 1989, the penalty was leviable for non-furnishing the return and the provisions at that relevant time in existence are as under : 7 Pritpal Kaur