BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi283Mumbai217Jaipur110Bangalore79Chennai66Ahmedabad50Allahabad42Raipur38Hyderabad38Chandigarh31Pune24Indore24Kolkata21Nagpur13Rajkot13Panaji13Lucknow12Guwahati10Surat8Dehradun4Visakhapatnam4Cuttack3Jabalpur2Amritsar2Patna1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 116Section 2(15)4Section 2502Section 143(3)2Section 234B2Section 12A2Exemption2Deduction2

SUB DIVISION SAANJH COMMUNITY POL ICING SOCIETY,KAPURTHALA vs. INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 13/ASR/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 234BSection 250

153 TTJ 235 (Amritsar)} 13. In view of the above, it is held that the case of the assessee is covered by proviso to section 2(15) and hence, does not fall within the category of a charitable organization. Accordingly, for the year under assessment, benefits under section 11 of the income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be allowed

COMMUNITY POLICING SUVIDHA CENTRE ( WEST ), NOW KNOWN AS SUB DIVISION SAANJH (COMMUNITY POLICING) SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD , JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 14/ASR/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 234BSection 250

153 TTJ 235 (Amritsar)} 13. In view of the above, it is held that the case of the assessee is covered by proviso to section 2(15) and hence, does not fall within the category of a charitable organization. Accordingly, for the year under assessment, benefits under section 11 of the income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be allowed