Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 116 Section 143(3)5 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 2(15)4 Section 1473 Deduction3 Section 2502 Section 234B2 Section 12A

SH. SARABJEET SINGH GUMTALA,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5(4), AMRITSAR

ITA 261/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Jun 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri L. P. Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Nipun Khanna (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Charan Dass, (D.R.)

Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 29.09.2014 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the facts on the record and this illegality pervades all grounds of appeal and no penalty was imposable. That the Worthy CIT(Appeals) without appreciating completed facts, submissions and legal position has further erred in confirming the decision

M/S NICE TELECOM,MANSA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), MANSA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

SH. SARABJEET SINGH GUMTALA,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5(4), AMRITSAR

M/S NICE TELECOM,MANSA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), MANSA

SH. SARABJEET SINGH GUMTALA,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5(4), AMRITSAR

M/S NICE TELECOM,MANSA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), MANSA

SUB DIVISION SAANJH COMMUNITY POL ICING SOCIETY,KAPURTHALA vs. INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) WARD, JALANDHAR

COMMUNITY POLICING SUVIDHA CENTRE ( WEST ), NOW KNOWN AS SUB DIVISION SAANJH (COMMUNITY POLICING) SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD , JALANDHAR