Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 150(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 12715 Section 271(1)(c)11 Section 2718 Section 246A6 Section 1436 Penalty4 Section 1323 Section 115V3 Section 200A3

SHRI PARDEEP KUMAR,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3), AMRITSAR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 734/ASR/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar05 Feb 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri L.P Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Milkhi Ram on behalf of Sh. Padam Bahl C.AFor Respondent: Shri Charan Dass, D.R

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) dated 25.01.2016 passed by the Assessing officer with the approval of Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range III, dated 08.03.2016 is illegal. 2. That no proper satisfaction was recorded by the learned Assessing Officer in the Assessment order or in the notice U/s 271(1)(c) read with Section 274 of the Income

SHRI PARDEEP KUMAR,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3), AMRITSAR

SHRI PARDEEP KUMAR,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3), AMRITSAR

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

D.CI.T , CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR vs. SH. SUBASH GANDHI , JALANDHAR

M/S. SURYA AUTOMOBILES PRIVATE LIMITED,ABOHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA vs. SH. DALJIT SINGH, BATHINDA

SH. AMRINDER SINGH DHIMAN,NAKODAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE PHAGWARA, PHAGWARA