85 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 14clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 85 · Page 1 of 5
The appeals of the assessees are disposed of in the terms indicated as above
Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee
14 I.T.A. Nos. 31 to 34/Asr/2023 Santokh Singh v. ITO, NFAC 9. A perusal of the above provisions of u/s. 271(1)(b) shows that the Parliament has used the words "may" and not "shall", thereby making their intention clear in as much as that levy of Penalty is discretionary and not automatic. The said conclusion is further justified