M/S SURINDER SAT AGRO FOODS ,JALALABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA
In the result, the three appeals of the assessee are allowed for
ITA 214/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2023AY 2013-14
Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee
For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kalia, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rajiv Wadhera, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 271(1)(c)Section 282
penalty imposed by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act on the tax sought to be evaded on the addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- which was estimated by the AO as alleged initial investment trading in paddy, rice and their bye-products without rebutting the contentions of the assessee raised during the course of assessment as well
