BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 397clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi386Karnataka357Mumbai197Bangalore138Hyderabad95Jaipur93Chennai81Kolkata41Chandigarh32Ahmedabad30Telangana30Indore29Raipur24Cochin16Calcutta16Agra14Surat11Pune10Cuttack10Dehradun8Lucknow7Guwahati7Nagpur6Rajkot6Rajasthan5Visakhapatnam4SC3Amritsar3Orissa2Jodhpur2Patna1Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 6818Section 56(1)(vii)15Section 153A9Addition to Income3

SHRIMATI JATINDER KAUR ( ALIAS AMRITA),JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 730/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Jul 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 153ASection 56(1)(vii)Section 68

397 ITR 82 (Delhi High Court): It was held that the statement of the director recorded u/s 132(4) did not constitute any incriminating material and the assumption of jurisdiction for assessment u/s 153A was not justified. Copy of the decision is enclosed at page no. 40 to 47. The only addition made in the impugned order is with regard

SHRIMATI JATINDER KAUR(ALIAS AMRITA),JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 728/ASR/2019[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
20 Jul 2021
AY 2011-12

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 153ASection 56(1)(vii)Section 68

397 ITR 82 (Delhi High Court): It was held that the statement of the director recorded u/s 132(4) did not constitute any incriminating material and the assumption of jurisdiction for assessment u/s 153A was not justified. Copy of the decision is enclosed at page no. 40 to 47. The only addition made in the impugned order is with regard

SHRIMATI JATINDER KAUR (ALIAS AMRITA),JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 731/ASR/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Jul 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 153ASection 56(1)(vii)Section 68

397 ITR 82 (Delhi High Court): It was held that the statement of the director recorded u/s 132(4) did not constitute any incriminating material and the assumption of jurisdiction for assessment u/s 153A was not justified. Copy of the decision is enclosed at page no. 40 to 47. The only addition made in the impugned order is with regard