Search: house property

2 results for “house property”+ Section 293clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi116 Mumbai75 Bangalore71 Jaipur58 Raipur33 Chandigarh16 Patna16 Indore16 Ahmedabad14 Chennai13 Pune8 Lucknow6 Hyderabad6 Kolkata5 Surat5 Agra4 Rajkot4 Visakhapatnam2 SC2 Amritsar2 Jabalpur1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 35A20 Section 143(3)6 Section 2502 Section 1482 House Property2 Deduction2 Set Off of Losses2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 104/ASR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2017-18 Ito, Ward-3(1), Vs. M/S Jatin Agro Fort Road, Ferozepur. 152-P, Ferozepur. [Pan:-Aarpm5393F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Ashray Sarna, Ca Appellant By Respondent By Sh. Sunil Gautam, Cit. Dr

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 35A

house property and denied the deduction claim under section 35AD(8)(c)(ii) of the Act. To my understanding, the term "specified business" means to include "setting up and operating a warehousing facility for storage of agricultural produce". Section 35AD(1) of the Act, postulates the allowability of deduction in respect of expenditure of capital nature incurred wholly and exclusively

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),FEROZEPUR, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),FEROZEPUR, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD