SMT. PRITPAL KAUR,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(3), JALANDHAR
ITA 59/ASR/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Aug 2023AY 2010-11
Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Mohit Kumar Nigam, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 2Section 271F
section 271F. Therefore, the penalty of Rs.5,000/- levied by the AO vide his order dated 21.05.2018 u/s 271F is sustained.
7. The assessee contends in grounds that ld. CIT(A) has wrongly held
that Authorized Representative of the assessee appeared before AO in the
penalty proceedings but not mentioned about the sale of property at which
the appellant residing
