Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

46 results for “disallowance”+ Unexplained Moneyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,008 Delhi1,693 Chennai725 Kolkata619 Bangalore408 Jaipur357 Hyderabad308 Ahmedabad304 Pune145 Chandigarh142 Indore138 Rajkot135 Cochin90 Surat89 Nagpur74 Lucknow54 Visakhapatnam51 Raipur50 Guwahati46 Amritsar46 Allahabad40 Calcutta38 Agra36 Panaji32 Jodhpur32 Patna27 Cuttack18 Dehradun18 Ranchi9 Varanasi8 Karnataka7 Telangana5 Jabalpur3 SC3 Orissa2 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Punjab & Haryana1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 153A54 Addition to Income46 Section 25033 Section 69A24 Undisclosed Income21 Section 143(3)20 Section 6818 Section 10(38)14 Disallowance13

SHRI RAMAN GUPTA,JAMMU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMMU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for

ITA 213/ASR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 May 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

unexplained money u/s 69 of the Act and added to the income of the assessee chargeable u/s 115BBE. Regarding addition on account of disallowance

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SAMBA vs. SH. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA, SAMBA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in Ground nos

ITA 475/ASR/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.475/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

Showing 1–20 of 46 · Page 1 of 3

Natural Justice9

Section 40

Section 80I

money, impugned order was to be upheld - Held, yes” Ground No. 5 10. The ld. DR vehemently argued and submitted that in this ground no. 5, the addition of Rs.16,30,510/- was made u/s 40A(3) of the Act. 11. The ld. AR in argument placed that the Ld. CIT(A) during appellate proceedings held that out of disallowance

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH, CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

ITA 347/ASR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A

Section 10(38)Section 132Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 68

Unexplained moneys (Share dealings) - High Court by impugned order held that where Assessing Officer disallowed exemption claimed by assessee under

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH. CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

ITA 346/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A

Section 10(38)Section 132Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 68

Unexplained moneys (Share dealings) - High Court by impugned order held that where Assessing Officer disallowed exemption claimed by assessee under

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 JALANDHAR, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 338/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. RAJNI MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 249/ASR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXQ, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 384/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. RAJNI MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 196/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 383/ASR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 391/ASR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 340/ASR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, JALANDHAR, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 339/ASR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 386/ASR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 385/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 387/ASR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 388/ASR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 389/ASR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUR MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 390/ASR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. ANKUSH MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 392/ASR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. RAJNI MARWAHA, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 251/ASR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

money u/s 69A of the Act in the absence of plausible explanation by the assessee without going into the merit of the case? 8. The appellant craves leave to add, amend modify, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal.” 4. During appeal proceedings