THE DHAMAI COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURE SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, HOSHIARPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.238/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-21

disallowed the deduction for violation of Section 80P(2)(d) of the the Act. In relation to restriction u/s 80P

THE NBI EMPLOYEES CO-OP NON-AGRICULTURAL THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,JALANDHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JALANDHAR

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

disallowance w.r.t. deduction claimed u/s 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which was required to be added to its income as rightly observed by the Ld. Pr. CIT. As per provisions of section 80P(2)(d

THE JASSOMAZARA COOP MULTIPUPOSE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAWANSHAHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the four appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. Nos. 513 To 516/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21

section 80P(2)(d) of the Act 61, ( as per narration of the AO in para – 5 of the order ) , I.T.A. Nos. 513 to 516/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2020-21 5 which the Ld AR of the assessee is claiming before the tribunal ( at the second appeal stage ) unsupported by any documentary evidence

THE JASSOMAZARA COOP MULTIPUPOSE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAWANSHAHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the four appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. Nos. 513 To 516/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21

section 80P(2)(d) of the Act 61, ( as per narration of the AO in para – 5 of the order ) , I.T.A. Nos. 513 to 516/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2020-21 5 which the Ld AR of the assessee is claiming before the tribunal ( at the second appeal stage ) unsupported by any documentary evidence

THE JASSOMAZARA COOP MULTIPUPOSE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAWANSHAHR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the four appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. Nos. 513 To 516/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21

section 80P(2)(d) of the Act 61, ( as per narration of the AO in para – 5 of the order ) , I.T.A. Nos. 513 to 516/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2020-21 5 which the Ld AR of the assessee is claiming before the tribunal ( at the second appeal stage ) unsupported by any documentary evidence

THE JASSOMAZARA COOP MULTIPUPOSE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAWANSAHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, all the four appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. Nos. 513 To 516/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21

section 80P(2)(d) of the Act 61, ( as per narration of the AO in para – 5 of the order ) , I.T.A. Nos. 513 to 516/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2020-21 5 which the Ld AR of the assessee is claiming before the tribunal ( at the second appeal stage ) unsupported by any documentary evidence

THE KOT RAM DASS COOP. THIRFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 (4), JALANDHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.86/Asr/2021 Assessment Year: 2017-18

disallowed the deduction for violation of Section 80P(2)(d) of the the Act. In relation to restriction u/s 80P

MESRES ATHOULA CO-OP AGRICULTURE MULTIPURPOSE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeal filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

disallowance are rightly endorsed by the Ld CIT(A). The appellant ground that the Ld CIT(A) erred in not setting aside the bifurcation of balance sheet of the assessee (duly audited by its auditors) done by the Ld AO on the basis of interest bearing funds and non interest bearing funds, since the funds has no colour

M/S ATHOULA CO-OP AGRICLUTURE MULTIPURPOSE SERVICE SOCIETY LTD,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeal filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

disallowance are rightly endorsed by the Ld CIT(A). The appellant ground that the Ld CIT(A) erred in not setting aside the bifurcation of balance sheet of the assessee (duly audited by its auditors) done by the Ld AO on the basis of interest bearing funds and non interest bearing funds, since the funds has no colour

M/S. THE FARIDKOT PRIMARY COOP AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK.LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, FEROZEPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

2)(c) of Income Tax Act may be provided but unfortunately section 80P(4) acts like a weapon cutting across the entire claim of deduction under the main section 80P. There is no confusion on the interpretation that once the appellant falls into the trappings of section 80P(4), it loses complete claim over the deduction is under section

THE MAHIL GAILAN COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURE SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED,MAHIL GAILAN, SBS NAGAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Brajesh Kumar Singh

section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 7. The ld. DR relied on the order of the ld. CIT(A) but has no objection if the matter is remanded back for fresh consideration. 8. We have heard the rival submissions and considered the materials on record and we are of the opinion that the notice of hearing has not been

THE BAGHAPURANA & CO OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD,MOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFEIER-2, MOGA

In the result, ground nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

80P(2) claimed by the assessee treating its income under the head “Business and Profession”. The considering fact, the assessee added back the interest 2,73,342/- on account of income from other sources by invoking section 56 of Act. Interest which was added u/s. 56 was received from Scheduled bank, Axis Bank, Baghapurana and Punjab National Bank

THE MUTHADA KHURD CO OPERATIVE AGRI MULTIPURPOSE SOCIETY LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, PHAGWARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

D. R. Date of Hearing : 15.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 31.07.2025 ORDER Per Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 20.06.2024 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has emanated from the order of the A.O. CPC, Bangaluru dated 09.06.2023 passed