Search: disallowance

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 690clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 35A20 Section 143(3)8 Section 364 Section 153C3 Deduction3 Section 250(6)2 Section 2502 Section 1482 Section 36(1)(viia)2 Addition to Income

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 104/ASR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2017-18 Ito, Ward-3(1), Vs. M/S Jatin Agro Fort Road, Ferozepur. 152-P, Ferozepur. [Pan:-Aarpm5393F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Ashray Sarna, Ca Appellant By Respondent By Sh. Sunil Gautam, Cit. Dr

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 35A

section 35AD of the Act, is against the principles of natural justice and relief. The disallowance made by the learned Assessing Officer needs to be deleted for substantial cause of justice and equity.” 9.6 Thereafter the ld. AR relied on the decision of Hon’ble High Court in the case of Haryana Warehousing Corporation Vs. ACIT

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),FEROZEPUR, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),FEROZEPUR, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BATHINDA vs. M/S THE MUKTSAR CENTRAL CO-OP.BANK LTD, MUKTSAR

GURU NANAK MILK PRODUCTS ,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR