ESS ESS KAY ENGINEERING COMPAY PRIVATE LIMITED ,KAPURTHALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

disallowed under section 43B or under section 36(l)(va); SLP dismissed" (v) That since the assessee appellant falls within the jurisdiction of the Hon'able Punjab & Haryana High Court, therefore, the decision of the jurisdictional High Court necessarily have to prevail even if there are contrary decisions/judgment of other High Court having a different opinion. I.T.A. Nos.23, 24&14/Asr/2023

M/S AMAR COACH BUILDERS ,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT CMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6,11,928/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance

SHRI SATISH KUMAR,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX FFICER WARD- 3 (3), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6,11,928/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance

M/S. RAMCO ENGG WORKS ,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (1), JALANDHAR

In the result, ITA No. 261/Asr/2022 is dismissed and ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

sections 40 to 43B spell out special provisions, laying out the mechanism for assessments I.T.A. Nos.261&253/Asr/2022 6 A. Y.: 2018-19 & 2019-20 and expressly prescribing conditions for disallowances

SHRI SACHIN KAPUR,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3 (2), JALANDHAR

In the result, ITA No. 261/Asr/2022 is dismissed and ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

sections 40 to 43B spell out special provisions, laying out the mechanism for assessments I.T.A. Nos.261&253/Asr/2022 6 A. Y.: 2018-19 & 2019-20 and expressly prescribing conditions for disallowances

M/S BELTEX RUBBER INDIA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

disallowed under section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from 1-4-1984 ** ** ** 22. It is important to note once again that, by the Finance Act, 2003, not only is the second proviso deleted but even the first proviso is sought to be amended by bringing about a uniformity in tax, duty, cess

M/S BELTEX RUBBER INDIA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (1) , JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

disallowed under section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from 1-4-1984 ** ** ** 22. It is important to note once again that, by the Finance Act, 2003, not only is the second proviso deleted but even the first proviso is sought to be amended by bringing about a uniformity in tax, duty, cess

NAVODIA TIMES PRIVATE LIMITED ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

disallowance was called for.” 5. The ld. Sr. DR vehemently argued and relied on the recent order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services P. Ltd. Vs CIT (Civil Appeal No.2833 of 2016 dated 12.10.2022), [2022] 143 taxmann.com 178 (SC). 6. We heard the rival submission and relied on the documents available in the records

PUNJ MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. CPC/INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3 (3), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the ground of appeal before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 4. The only grievance of the assessee relates to the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section

M/S SHREE GANESH KNITTERS,AMRITSAR vs. ASSESSING OFFICER WARD -5 ( 5 ), AMRITSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the ground of appeal before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 4. The only grievance of the assessee relates to the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section

M/S CEELA SPORTS ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the ground of appeal before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 4. The only grievance of the assessee relates to the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section

VARIETY ENTERPRISES,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the ground of appeal before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 4. The only grievance of the assessee relates to the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section

PUNJ MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. CPC/INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3 (3), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the ground of appeal before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 4. The only grievance of the assessee relates to the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section

TALBRO INTERNATIONAL,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 4 ( 1 ), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the ground of appeal before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 4. The only grievance of the assessee relates to the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section

M/S DIAMOND RED TANNERIES,KAPURTHALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the ground of appeal before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 4. The only grievance of the assessee relates to the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section

M/S. S S FORGINGS,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2 (4), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

6. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the ground of appeal before the appeal is heard and disposed off. 4. The only grievance of the assessee relates to the disallowance of Rs. 2,17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section

SHRI AMARJEET AGGARWAL & COMPANY,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1 (1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance was sustained. 5. Now the assessee is in appeal. 6

SHRI ASHOK KUMAR,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 5 (1), AMRITSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance was sustained. 5. Now the assessee is in appeal. 6