BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi63Ahmedabad35Surat29Pune28Bangalore27Jaipur27Indore24Mumbai21Chennai14Raipur12Rajkot9Agra9Hyderabad6Chandigarh6Kolkata6Jodhpur5Karnataka5Nagpur5Amritsar3Visakhapatnam2Cuttack2Jabalpur2Cochin1Ranchi1SC1Patna1Dehradun1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 10(37)6Section 54B5Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 143(3)2Section 54F2Exemption2Disallowance2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2 , PHAGWARA vs. SH. SUCHA SINGH, PHILLAUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 702/ASR/2017[2009-10]Status: FixedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shrilaliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10(37)Section 143(2)Section 54B

disallowed by the competent authority. 4. At Para-4, page-56 it is written that "And whereas in pursuance of section 3D(1) of the said act, the competent authority had submitted its report to the Central Govt." 5. And in the last Para at page 56 of gazette, it is mentioned that as per section

DAVINDER SINGH,SAMAOH PUNJAB vs. ITO WARD 1(4), MANSA, MANSA,PUNJAB

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 214/ASR/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
12 Mar 2026
AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 214/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Sh. Davinder Singh, Bhal Patti, Vs. Ito, Ward-1(4), Samaon, Matti B.O. Kotra, Mansa. Mansa, Punjab. [Pan:-Abmps3429E] (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Rohit Kapoor, Adv & Sh. Appellant By Himanshu Gupta, Ca Respondent By Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. Dr

Section 10(37)Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 250Section 54BSection 54F

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s 54B and u/s 54F which has arisen on the sale of land resulting in long-term capital gain. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the sale consideration declared by the assessee in income tax return was less than the sale consideration reported in Form 26QB (Form 26QB and schedule

SHRI NIRVAIR SINGH,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4(3), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 655/ASR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jul 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Nipun Khanna, C. A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250Section 250o

disallowances along with necessary evidence /reasons for forming same which in contravention to CBDT Instruction Number 20/2015 Dated 29/12/2015. 7. That the order passed by the Ld. Assessing officer and further upheld by worthy CIT (Appeals) is infructuous and bad in law as the Ld. Assessing officer had erred on law and facts in making addition