BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 301clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai882Delhi662Chennai181Bangalore162Ahmedabad114Kolkata106Pune93Jaipur85Indore60Cochin50Hyderabad47Surat40Allahabad37Rajkot35Chandigarh29Lucknow21Cuttack21Visakhapatnam14Nagpur14Panaji8Karnataka7Raipur6Jodhpur5Telangana5Patna3Amritsar3SC3Ranchi2Agra2Rajasthan1Guwahati1Jabalpur1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5Section 271(1)(C)4Section 40A(3)4Addition to Income3Section 133A2Section 143(3)2Survey u/s 133A2

SH. ANUP KUMAR JAITLY,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -3(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 112/ASR/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Ghansham Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 133Section 143(3)Section 3Section 40A(3)

disallowance under sub-section (3) of section 40A shall be made and no payment shall be deemed to be the profits and gains of business or profession under subsection (3A) of section 40A where a payment or aggregate of payments made to a person in a day, otherwise than by an account payee cheque drawn on a bank or account

SHRI YASH PAUL MALHOTRA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 379/ASR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)

section 271(1) raises a presumption of concealment, when difference is noted by the AO between reported and assessed income” The ld. AR further explained that the backdrop of the facts in the case of Mak Data was quite different from the facts of the instant case before us , because in the case of Mak Data, there was difference

M/S MEHTA INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD (EXEMPTION), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 26/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, ARFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 10

301/- has been debited under the same head and also been allowed and have never been doubted by the worthy CIT(A) & the Ld. AO. It was also brought to the notice of Ld. AO that the 8 Mehta Institute of Education v. ITO part of the agriculture property owned by Mrs. Dimple Mehta, one of the trustees of Mehta