M. K HOTEL & RESORTS LIMITED,AMRITSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

disallowed under section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from 1-4-1984 ** ** ** 22. It is important to note once again that, by the Finance Act, 2003, not only is the second proviso deleted but even the first proviso is sought to be amended by bringing about a uniformity in tax, duty, cess

KAY SWITCGEARS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KAPURTHALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

disallowed under section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from 1-4-1984 ** ** ** 22. It is important to note once again that, by the Finance Act, 2003, not only is the second proviso deleted but even the first proviso is sought to be amended by bringing about a uniformity in tax, duty, cess

M/S. RAMCO ENGG WORKS ,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (1), JALANDHAR

In the result, ITA No. 261/Asr/2022 is dismissed and ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

iii) in respect of a deduction, where such deduction exceeds specified statutory limit which may have been expressed as monetary amount or percentage or ratio or fraction;' 9.3. Now we focus on clause (iv) of section 143(1)(a) which provides for 'disallowance of expenditure or increase in income indicated in the audit report but not taken into account

SHRI SACHIN KAPUR,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3 (2), JALANDHAR

In the result, ITA No. 261/Asr/2022 is dismissed and ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

iii) in respect of a deduction, where such deduction exceeds specified statutory limit which may have been expressed as monetary amount or percentage or ratio or fraction;' 9.3. Now we focus on clause (iv) of section 143(1)(a) which provides for 'disallowance of expenditure or increase in income indicated in the audit report but not taken into account

NAVODIA TIMES PRIVATE LIMITED ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

26 Assessment Year: 2018-19 be considered as falling either under clause (ii) or (iv) of section 143(1). For ready reference, we are extracting the relevant provision as under: '143. (1) Where a return has been made under section 139, or in response to a notice under sub-section (1) of section 142, such return shall be processed

M/S BELTEX RUBBER INDIA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

iii) in respect of a deduction, where such deduction exceeds specified statutory limit which may have been expressed as monetary amount or percentage or ratio or fraction;' 9.3. Now we focus on clause (iv) of section 143(1)(a) which provides for 'disallowance of expenditure or increase in income indicated in the audit report but not taken into account

M/S BELTEX RUBBER INDIA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (1) , JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

iii) in respect of a deduction, where such deduction exceeds specified statutory limit which may have been expressed as monetary amount or percentage or ratio or fraction;' 9.3. Now we focus on clause (iv) of section 143(1)(a) which provides for 'disallowance of expenditure or increase in income indicated in the audit report but not taken into account

ATC LOGISTICAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, AMRITSAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

disallowed under section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from 1-4-1984 ** ** ** 22. It is important to note once again that, by the Finance Act, 2003, not only is the second proviso deleted but even the first proviso is sought to be amended by bringing about a uniformity in tax, duty, cess

ROYAL FURNISHER ,JAMMU vs. ASSESING OFFICER WARD- 2 (2), JAMMU

In the result appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

disallowed under section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from 1-4-1984 ** ** ** 22. It is important to note once again that, by the Finance Act, 2003, not only is the second proviso deleted but even the first proviso is sought to be amended by bringing about a uniformity in tax, duty, cess

M/S AMAR COACH BUILDERS ,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT CMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

iii) CIT vs. GTN Textiles Ltd. (2004) 269 ITR 282 (Ker) (iv) CIT vs. Jairam& Sons [2004] 269 ITR 285 (Ker) The impugned ESI/PF disallowance is directed to be deleted therefore.” 10. On an identical issue, this Bench of the Tribunal vide order dated 12.8.2021 in the case of Mohangarh Engineers and Construction Company, Jodhpur & Others vs CPC, Banglore

SHRI SATISH KUMAR,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX FFICER WARD- 3 (3), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

iii) CIT vs. GTN Textiles Ltd. (2004) 269 ITR 282 (Ker) (iv) CIT vs. Jairam& Sons [2004] 269 ITR 285 (Ker) The impugned ESI/PF disallowance is directed to be deleted therefore.” 10. On an identical issue, this Bench of the Tribunal vide order dated 12.8.2021 in the case of Mohangarh Engineers and Construction Company, Jodhpur & Others vs CPC, Banglore

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

III, Jalandhar Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant I.T.A. No. 129/Asr/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s Sadhu Singh Hamdard Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Spl. Range, Jalandhar Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant 3 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. Appellant by : Sh. Gunjeet Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

III, Jalandhar Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant I.T.A. No. 129/Asr/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s Sadhu Singh Hamdard Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Spl. Range, Jalandhar Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant 3 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. Appellant by : Sh. Gunjeet Singh

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

III, Jalandhar Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant I.T.A. No. 129/Asr/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s Sadhu Singh Hamdard Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Spl. Range, Jalandhar Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant 3 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. Appellant by : Sh. Gunjeet Singh

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

III, Jalandhar Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant I.T.A. No. 129/Asr/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s Sadhu Singh Hamdard Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Spl. Range, Jalandhar Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant 3 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. Appellant by : Sh. Gunjeet Singh

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

III, Jalandhar Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant I.T.A. No. 129/Asr/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s Sadhu Singh Hamdard Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Spl. Range, Jalandhar Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant 3 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. Appellant by : Sh. Gunjeet Singh

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

III, Jalandhar Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant I.T.A. No. 129/Asr/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s Sadhu Singh Hamdard Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Spl. Range, Jalandhar Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant 3 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. Appellant by : Sh. Gunjeet Singh

DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

III, Jalandhar Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant I.T.A. No. 129/Asr/2002 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/s Sadhu Singh Hamdard Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Trust, Nehru Garden Road, Spl. Range, Jalandhar Jalandhar [PAN: AAATS 3278A] (Respondent) (Appellant 3 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. Appellant by : Sh. Gunjeet Singh