BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai453Delhi256Bangalore173Chennai156Kolkata137Ahmedabad43Hyderabad35Pune26Jaipur23Cuttack18Raipur13Visakhapatnam13Chandigarh11Amritsar11Cochin9Rajkot9Karnataka9Panaji9Patna7Surat6Indore5Dehradun4Jodhpur3Lucknow3Agra3SC3Calcutta2Nagpur2Telangana2Allahabad2Guwahati1Uttarakhand1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 4024Addition to Income11Disallowance10Section 143(3)9Deduction9TDS9Depreciation8Section 250(6)7Section 14A(3)7Section 36

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU, SRINAGAR vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 790/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

194J of the Act and therefore the disallowance made by him is incorrect. Similar type of disallowance has been deleted by your predecessor in the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,2010-11 & 2011-12 on I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 11 & Others appeals merits. The Hon'ble IT AT, Amritsar Bench has upheld this decision that

THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD,, SRINAGAR

7
Section 143(1)7
Section 44A6

In the result, the ground No

ITA 297/ASR/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

194J of the Act and therefore the disallowance made by him is incorrect. Similar type of disallowance has been deleted by your predecessor in the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,2010-11 & 2011-12 on I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 11 & Others appeals merits. The Hon'ble IT AT, Amritsar Bench has upheld this decision that

THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED,SRINAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU

In the result, the ground No

ITA 330/ASR/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

194J of the Act and therefore the disallowance made by him is incorrect. Similar type of disallowance has been deleted by your predecessor in the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,2010-11 & 2011-12 on I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 11 & Others appeals merits. The Hon'ble IT AT, Amritsar Bench has upheld this decision that

THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD,, SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 296/ASR/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

194J of the Act and therefore the disallowance made by him is incorrect. Similar type of disallowance has been deleted by your predecessor in the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,2010-11 & 2011-12 on I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 11 & Others appeals merits. The Hon'ble IT AT, Amritsar Bench has upheld this decision that

ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 320/ASR/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

194J of the Act and therefore the disallowance made by him is incorrect. Similar type of disallowance has been deleted by your predecessor in the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,2010-11 & 2011-12 on I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 11 & Others appeals merits. The Hon'ble IT AT, Amritsar Bench has upheld this decision that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX , CIRCLE -1,, JAMMU vs. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD.,, SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 637/ASR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

194J of the Act and therefore the disallowance made by him is incorrect. Similar type of disallowance has been deleted by your predecessor in the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,2010-11 & 2011-12 on I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 11 & Others appeals merits. The Hon'ble IT AT, Amritsar Bench has upheld this decision that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 319/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

194J of the Act and therefore the disallowance made by him is incorrect. Similar type of disallowance has been deleted by your predecessor in the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,2010-11 & 2011-12 on I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 11 & Others appeals merits. The Hon'ble IT AT, Amritsar Bench has upheld this decision that

SH RACHHPAL SINGH,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMRITSAR.

Accordingly, we herein set aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to assess the income of the assessee as offered by him under section 44AD of the Act. The Grounds of appeal...

ITA 140/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Dec 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Sh. Randeep Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Trilochan Singh, PS
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 44A

disallowance of expenses of the appellant claimed in the return of Income. 6) On the given grounds it is appealed that the additions in income of Rs. 10,39,691/- should be deleted. 7) That the appellant craves leave to add, amend or withdraw any new ground or grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing of appeal

MESERS MILLENNIUM WIRES PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 425/ASR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar08 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Hon’Ble & Sh. Ravish Soodita No.425/Asr./2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 M/S Millennium Wires Pvt. Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ltd., D-30, Focal Point, Central Circle-Ii, Jalandhar Jalandhar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccm9631J Assessee By : Sh. Sandip Vijh, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Ved Pal Singh, Dr Date Of Hearing : 07.01.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.01.2019

For Appellant: Sh. Sandip Vijh, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Ved Pal Singh, DR
Section 194JSection 40

194J of the Act but no TDS was deducted, therefore, the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act were rightly attracted in this case. He accordingly confirmed the addition made by the AO. 5. Now the assessee is in appeal. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the deductees had already paid the tax, therefore, no disallowance

SHRI BALDEV SINGH ,ABOHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 3 (2), FEROZEPUR

In the result, the appeal bearing ITA No

ITA 48/ASR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(1)Section 250o

194J, the adjustment could not have been made without conducting any enquiry, more particularly when the man power supply is not covered as a profession within the meaning of section 44AA of the Act read with relevant notifications. We find force in the contention of the Ld. AR that this particular issue could not have been decided

SH. JASBIR SINGH S/O TEK CHAND,,HOSHIARPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, HOSHIARPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 600/ASR/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar01 Jan 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 600/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Sh. J. K. Passi (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 147

section 143(3) read with sec. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated 30.11.2010 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2007-08. 2. The appeal being time-barred, the first issue is if the delay could be condoned, and the appeal admitted. The delay is explained as on account of non- receipt of the appellate order