M/S SHREE GANESH KNITTERS,AMRITSAR vs. ASSESSING OFFICER WARD -5 ( 5 ), AMRITSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance

VARIETY ENTERPRISES,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance

TALBRO INTERNATIONAL,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 4 ( 1 ), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance

M/S. S S FORGINGS,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2 (4), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance

M/S CEELA SPORTS ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance

PUNJ MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. CPC/INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3 (3), JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

17,287/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance

KAY SWITCGEARS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KAPURTHALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

disallowance of such payments I.T.A. Nos.23, 24&14/Asr/2023 16 A.Ys.: 2019-20 & 2020-21 is too harsh a punishment for delayed payments. Therefore, we recommend that the deduction for delayed payment of statutory liability relating to labour should be allowed in the year of payment like delayed taxes and interest." Based on the report, the Union introduced amendments

M. K HOTEL & RESORTS LIMITED,AMRITSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

disallowance of such payments I.T.A. Nos.23, 24&14/Asr/2023 16 A.Ys.: 2019-20 & 2020-21 is too harsh a punishment for delayed payments. Therefore, we recommend that the deduction for delayed payment of statutory liability relating to labour should be allowed in the year of payment like delayed taxes and interest." Based on the report, the Union introduced amendments

ESS ESS KAY ENGINEERING COMPAY PRIVATE LIMITED ,KAPURTHALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

disallowance of such payments I.T.A. Nos.23, 24&14/Asr/2023 16 A.Ys.: 2019-20 & 2020-21 is too harsh a punishment for delayed payments. Therefore, we recommend that the deduction for delayed payment of statutory liability relating to labour should be allowed in the year of payment like delayed taxes and interest." Based on the report, the Union introduced amendments

RAGA MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

MEDALLAY EXPORTS,JALANDHAR vs. ASSSTANT COMMISSIONER OF NCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

RAGHU EXPORTS ( INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

RAGHU EXPORTS ( INDIA ) PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSONER OF INCME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

SHRIMATI SNEH LATA, DARBAR FEED MILLS,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), JALANDHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Furnishing The Return Of Income Under Section 139(1) Of The Act. When The Matter Was Taken To The Ld. Cit(A) The Said Disallowance Was Sustained.

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

KOCHAR SUNG UP ACRYLIC LIMITED,AMRITSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMIOSSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, AMRITSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

M/S SPEEDWAYS RUBBER COMPANY ,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

KOCHAR INFOTECH LIMITERD,AMRITSAR vs. DEPUTY CXOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, AMRITSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

SHRI ASHOK KUMAR,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 5 (1), AMRITSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed