M/S NASA AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,FAZILKA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE- II, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal i

Bench: Sh. N.S.Saini & Sh. N.K.Choudhry

disallowance of Rs.2,29,812/- under provision of ITA Nos.536 & 537 /Asr/2017 2 (A.Ys.2013-14 & 2014-15) M/s Nasa Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Bhatinda section 14A

MAX FINANCIAL SERVICE LIMITED ,NAWANSHAHR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is therefore partly allowed

14A. Interest shown by the assessee is from investing activity and not from business activity. The AO has failed to examine the issue of admissibility of expense claimed by the assessee against such income and the reason for showing losses on the basis of facts of the case. According to section 37(1) of the Income

SHRI RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. N.K. Saini, Hon'Ble & Shri. Ravish Sood

section 14A(2). In so far as the quantum of disallowance is concerned, Rule 8D is admittedly applicable from the assessment

SHRI RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. N.K. Saini, Hon'Ble & Shri. Ravish Sood

section 14A(2). In so far as the quantum of disallowance is concerned, Rule 8D is admittedly applicable from the assessment

THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD,, SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 for expenses related to exempt income. I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 6 & Others appeals 5. On the other hand the assessee filed appeal in relation to addition for disallowance of section 36(1) (viia) of the Act. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 for expenses related to exempt income. I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 6 & Others appeals 5. On the other hand the assessee filed appeal in relation to addition for disallowance of section 36(1) (viia) of the Act. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD,, SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 for expenses related to exempt income. I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 6 & Others appeals 5. On the other hand the assessee filed appeal in relation to addition for disallowance of section 36(1) (viia) of the Act. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED,SRINAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 for expenses related to exempt income. I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 6 & Others appeals 5. On the other hand the assessee filed appeal in relation to addition for disallowance of section 36(1) (viia) of the Act. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU, SRINAGAR vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 for expenses related to exempt income. I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 6 & Others appeals 5. On the other hand the assessee filed appeal in relation to addition for disallowance of section 36(1) (viia) of the Act. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX , CIRCLE -1,, JAMMU vs. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD.,, SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 for expenses related to exempt income. I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 6 & Others appeals 5. On the other hand the assessee filed appeal in relation to addition for disallowance of section 36(1) (viia) of the Act. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 for expenses related to exempt income. I.T.A. No. 790/Asr/2017 6 & Others appeals 5. On the other hand the assessee filed appeal in relation to addition for disallowance of section 36(1) (viia) of the Act. Aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD,, SRINAGAR

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: Sh. T. S. Kapoor & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 298/(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Pan: Aaact6167G Dy. C. I. T., Vs. M/S. The Jammu & Kashmir Circle-1, 2Nd Floor Aayakar Bank Ltd., Corporate Head Bhawan, Railhead Complex, Quarters, M. A. Road, Jammu. Srinagar. (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 14A of the I.T. Act, 1961 to restrict the amount of disallowance worked out as per Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules.” 3. At the outset, the Ld. AR submitted that each and every grievance of the revenue is duly covered in favour of assessee by the order of the Amritsar Bench in ITA No. 206/Asr/2013

SHRI KAILASH CHAND (PROP) M.K. STEELS,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal is decided in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

2,10,023/-by the AO under section 154 of the act was justified, even though it was much more than the exempted income was certainly against law and cannot be approved. Under no circumstances, disallowances under section 14A

M/S. SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A of the EC Act and Rule 11 of the PAT Rules, 2012 issuesthe ‘energy savings certificates’ to these Designated Consumers, whose energy consumption is less than the prescribed norms and standards. g. Further, the objective of REC mechanism is to promote ‘renewable energy’ and facilitate compliance of Renewable Purchase Obligations (‘RPO’) through a market-based instrument aimed at addressing

POONAM MARWAHA,AMRITSAR vs. ACIT DCIT CEN CIR, AMRITSAR

Bench: Sh. Vikram Singh Yadav & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

disallowances and cash payment in excess of Rs. 20,000 in a single day required detailed verification - Tribunal observed that during assessment proceedings, assessee submitted cash payment register and explained each item of proposed addition as per show cause notice of Assessing Officer and Assessing Officer, after going through cash payment register and explanation of each item, did not make

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 1,, JALANDHAR vs. M/S KAPSONS INDUSTRIES LTD.,, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue Department stands dismissed

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N.K.Choudhryita No.511(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year:2014-15

section 14A of the Income Tax Act,1961. 2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs.4,23,955/- which was made by the A.O. by disallowing

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, SRINAGAR vs. M/S TRUMBO CEMENT INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the Ground no-1 of the Revenue for ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A. As the A.O has observed that the assessee has utilized business funds for share application money and there was no close proximity to the business of the assessee company and investment in Tramboo Industries Pvt. Ltd. and the assessee has utilized business funds for earning dividend which is an exempt income and only proportionate disallowance of expenses was made

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, SRINAGAR vs. M/S TRUMBO CEMENT INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, SRINAGAR

In the result, the Ground no-1 of the Revenue for ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

14A. As the A.O has observed that the assessee has utilized business funds for share application money and there was no close proximity to the business of the assessee company and investment in Tramboo Industries Pvt. Ltd. and the assessee has utilized business funds for earning dividend which is an exempt income and only proportionate disallowance of expenses was made