Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

330 results for “disallowance”+ Disallowanceclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19,289 Delhi15,909 Chennai5,736 Bangalore5,569 Kolkata4,174 Ahmedabad2,781 Pune2,736 Hyderabad1,923 Jaipur1,230 Cochin980 Chandigarh968 Indore743 Surat689 Visakhapatnam550 Raipur536 Nagpur484 Rajkot477 Lucknow370 Amritsar330 Cuttack319 Panaji240 Jodhpur228 Agra224 Patna202 Ranchi199 Karnataka189 Guwahati172 SC158 Dehradun146 Calcutta103 Jabalpur102 Allahabad92 Varanasi33 Punjab & Haryana30 Kerala25 Telangana24 Orissa13 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7 Rajasthan6 Gauhati2 Himachal Pradesh2 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1 Andhra Pradesh1 RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1 Uttarakhand1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1 J&K1 Bombay1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income94 Section 14478 Disallowance64 Section 250(6)59 Natural Justice59 Section 153A56 Section 143(3)36 Depreciation35 Section 14729 Section 148

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 291/ASR/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

Showing 1–20 of 330 · Page 1 of 17

...

24

ITA 255/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: Disposed

ITAT Amritsar

24 Feb 2023

AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 292/ASR/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 293/ASR/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 289/ASR/2015[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2002-03

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 290/ASR/2015[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2003-04

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 294/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 470/ASR/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 471/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 417/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

disallowance on account of expenditure claimed as prior period expenses amounting to Rs. 4, 35, 404/-, which disallowance

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- 3, SRINAGAR vs. MEASAGE SAIFCO CEEMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the Department and CO of the Assesse is 23

ITA 451/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar23 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Rajiv Wadhera, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)

disallowance of interest u/s 36(i) (iii) 2. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 431620/- on a/c of 10% of disallowance

M. K HOTEL & RESORTS LIMITED,AMRITSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

ITA 14/ASR/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

Section 143(1)Section 250oSection 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance made u/s 36(1)(va) in the Intimation under section 143(1)(a) can be construed as a 'disallowance

KAY SWITCGEARS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KAPURTHALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

ITA 24/ASR/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

Section 143(1)Section 250oSection 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance made u/s 36(1)(va) in the Intimation under section 143(1)(a) can be construed as a 'disallowance

ESS ESS KAY ENGINEERING COMPAY PRIVATE LIMITED ,KAPURTHALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

ITA 23/ASR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.23/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Pvt. Ltd. Factory Area, Commissioner Of Income Jalandhar. Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. [Pan: Aaace5057G] (Respondent) (Appellant)

Section 143(1)Section 250oSection 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance made u/s 36(1)(va) in the Intimation under section 143(1)(a) can be construed as a 'disallowance

M/S. RAMCO ENGG WORKS ,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (1), JALANDHAR

In the result, ITA No. 261/Asr/2022 is dismissed and ITA No

ITA 253/ASR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250oSection 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance in the audit report, which is short of direct reporting of the disallowance, the case gets covered

SHRI SACHIN KAPUR,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3 (2), JALANDHAR

In the result, ITA No. 261/Asr/2022 is dismissed and ITA No

ITA 261/ASR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250oSection 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance in the audit report, which is short of direct reporting of the disallowance, the case gets covered

NAVODIA TIMES PRIVATE LIMITED ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is

ITA 192/ASR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 234CSection 250oSection 36

disallowance made u/s 36(1)(va) in the Intimation under section 143(1)(a) can be construed as a 'disallowance

M/S BELTEX RUBBER INDIA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (1) , JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is dismissed

ITA 8/ASR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(1)Section 250o

disallowance made u/s 36(1)(va) in the Intimation under section 143(1)(a) can be construed as a 'disallowance

M/S BELTEX RUBBER INDIA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 1 (1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 192/Asr/2022 is dismissed

ITA 9/ASR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 Mar 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(1)Section 250o

disallowance made u/s 36(1)(va) in the Intimation under section 143(1)(a) can be construed as a 'disallowance

SH. RAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL,JALANDHAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, JALANDHAR

The appeal stand partly allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 32/ASR/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Jun 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Udayan Das Gupta, Jm आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No. 32/Asr/2011 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2007-08) Shri Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal Dcit बनाम/ Vs. 310-A Guru Tegh Bahadur Nagar Range-Iii Jalandhar. Jalandhar. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aakpa-3150-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/Appellant By : Sh. Sandeep Vijh (Ca) –Ld.Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondentby : Sh. Rajiv Wadhera (Addl. Cit) – Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 23-04-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 10-06-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2007-08 Arises Out Of An Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jalandhar [Cit(A)] Dated 29-11-2010 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Assessing Officer [Ao] U/S. 143(3) Of The Act On 17-12- 2009. Upon Perusal Of Records, It Could Be Seen That The Assessee’S Appeal As Well As Revenue’S Appeal For This Year Was Disposed-Off By Tribunal Vide Ita No.32/Asr/2011 & Ita No.45/Asr/2011 Common Order Dated 12-10-2012. The Appeal Of The Assessee Was Partly Allowed

For Appellant: Sh. Sandeep Vijh (CA) –Ld.ARFor Respondent: Sh. Rajiv Wadhera (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR

disallowed for want of cogent explanation / documentary evidences as forthcoming from the assessee. 4.1 Disallowance of Wages The Ld. AO alleged