BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Transfer Pricingclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,679Delhi1,417Bangalore714Chennai413Kolkata290Ahmedabad190Hyderabad121Pune101Chandigarh93Jaipur62Indore40Surat39Cochin34Karnataka32Raipur25Visakhapatnam24Lucknow24SC20Rajkot16Telangana13Kerala7Nagpur6Jodhpur5Guwahati4Agra4Dehradun4Calcutta3Amritsar3Panaji3Rajasthan2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Ranchi1Jabalpur1Patna1Orissa1Varanasi1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)4Section 2503Addition to Income3Section 1482Section 143(3)2Section 36(1)(iii)2Section 362Depreciation2Disallowance2

M/S CITI PLAZA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 3(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 356/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 147Section 148Section 250

price of Rs.2,30,00,000/-, has wrongly been assessed and upheld in this case. I.T.A. No. 356/Asr/2017 3 Assessment Year: 2006-07 6. That the Id.CIT(A) was not justified in ignoring assessee's submissions that if at all the reopening was valid, the Id ITO could not have given a clean chit to other group of partners headed

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

In the result the ground no

ITA 324/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar
22 Sept 2022
AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(3)

depreciation on car which was used for director’s personal expenses. Aggrieved assesseefled an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) the ld. CIT(A) reduced the addition related to disallowance of expenses on estimated basis. In appeal the disallowances are reduced to 1/10th of total expenses. The assessee filed an appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The CIT(A) partly

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

In the result the ground no

ITA 325/ASR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(3)

depreciation on car which was used for director’s personal expenses. Aggrieved assesseefled an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) the ld. CIT(A) reduced the addition related to disallowance of expenses on estimated basis. In appeal the disallowances are reduced to 1/10th of total expenses. The assessee filed an appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The CIT(A) partly