BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “depreciation”+ Section 94(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,442Delhi1,083Bangalore473Chennai377Ahmedabad373Kolkata230Jaipur155Hyderabad127Pune117Chandigarh91Indore80Raipur70Cochin64Visakhapatnam56Cuttack56Surat43Lucknow25Karnataka21Nagpur17Jodhpur16Rajkot14SC12Dehradun11Allahabad10Guwahati9Panaji7Amritsar6Agra6Telangana5Patna4Ranchi3Punjab & Haryana2Calcutta2Jabalpur2Kerala2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Orissa1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 106Section 271(1)(c)5Section 143(3)4Section 271(1)(C)4Section 80I4Section 80G4Addition to Income4Deduction3Depreciation3Section 250(6)

M/S BINDRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, FEROZEPUR

In the result, Ground Nos

ITA 190/ASR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.190/Asr/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250o

7. The ld. DR fully relied on the order of the revenue authorities. Ground No. 5 8. The ld. AR claimed that the assessee is entitled depreciation in the impugned assessment year amount of Rs.15,94,447/-. But the ld. CIT(A) had a grievance that the assessee claimed depreciation in the tax audit report amount to Rs.84

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

2
Section 133A2
Disallowance2
ITA 530/ASR/2009[]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
16 Aug 2021

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10Section 12ASection 2Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

7 b. No provision of Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 provides that SGPC (ie. Board) has been formed only for the benefit of the Sikh community only nor does any provision of Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925, say that SGPC (Board) is a religious body nor does the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 provide that the activities of SGPC shall be restricted

M/S STEP BY STEP JUNIOR SCHOOL SOCIETY,AMRITSAR. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

ITA 596/ASR/2016[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10

7. Decision of ITAT, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar in the case of The Managing Committee, Arya High School, Mansa vs. CIT(E) Chandigarh in ITA No. 469(ASR)/2016, order dated 11/08/2017 relating to AY 2015-16. [Refer Page No.135 to 142 of compilation of judgments]. 8. Decision of ITAT Amritsar Bench Amritsar in the case of Sant Ishwar Shiksha Samiti

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SAMBA vs. SH. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA, SAMBA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in Ground nos

ITA 475/ASR/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.475/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 40Section 80I

depreciation allowance and viii) disallowance U/s 40A(3) amount to Rs. 8,38,000/-.Being aggrieved the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee. Being aggrieved revenue filed an appeal before us. Ground No.1 4. In the ground no. 1 of the revenue, the DR vehemently argued and contended

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) CIRCLE-3, FEROZEPUR vs. MEASAGE OM SONS MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, FARIDKOT

In the result, the appeal of the revenue bearing ITA No

ITA 407/ASR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 37(1)Section 56(2)(viib)

94 taxmann.com 112 wherein, it was held that where there was no possibility of verifying the correctness or otherwise of the data supplied by the assessee to the merchant banker, in the absence of which the correctness of the result of DCF method could not be verified, there was no option to the AO but to reject the DCF I.T.A

SHRI YASH PAUL MALHOTRA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 379/ASR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)

7 Assessment Year: 2016-17 statements, memorandum of association of companies, affidavits, copies of Income Tax Returns and assessment orders and blank share transfer deeds duly signed, have been impounded in the course of survey proceedings under Section 133A conducted on 16.12.2003, in the case of a sister concern of the assessee. The survey was conducted more than 10 months