Search: depreciation

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai88 Delhi63 Chennai39 Bangalore32 Kolkata21 Raipur17 Pune8 Surat8 Panaji7 Hyderabad6 Ahmedabad5 Jaipur5 Ranchi4 SC3 Indore3 Karnataka2 Cochin2 Amritsar2 Chandigarh1 Allahabad1 Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5 Section 271(1)(C)4 Section 80G4 Section 133A2

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 530/ASR/2009[]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10Section 12ASection 2Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

depreciation in respect of 42,000 bottles out of the total number of bottles (5,46,000), by reason of the impugned judgment. That benefit is sought to be taken away by the Department, which is not permissible in law. This is the infirmity in the impugned judgment of the High Court and the Tribunal.” d. The elementary principle found

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

SHRI YASH PAUL MALHOTRA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR