BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 36(1)(viii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi623Mumbai619Bangalore230Ahmedabad141Chennai86Chandigarh81Jaipur71Kolkata69Hyderabad43Rajkot33Indore32Pune29Ranchi29Guwahati28Cochin25Visakhapatnam25Raipur23Karnataka19Lucknow16Surat12Cuttack10SC8Agra7Dehradun6Kerala5Amritsar3Allahabad2Jodhpur2Calcutta2Varanasi2Nagpur2Telangana2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 80G4Section 12A4Section 103Section 2633Section 143(3)2Deduction2

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 530/ASR/2009[]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10Section 12ASection 2Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

depreciation in respect of 42,000 bottles out of the total number of bottles (5,46,000), by reason of the impugned judgment. That benefit is sought to be taken away by the Department, which is not permissible in law. This is the infirmity in the impugned judgment of the High Court and the Tribunal.” d. The elementary principle found

THE OXFORD EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 583/ASR/2016[]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Aug 2021

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 583/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: N/A M/S The Oxford Educational & Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society (Oxbridge Chandigarh. World School, Kotkapura) Hira Singh Nagar, Kotkapura, Faridkot (Punjab) [Pan: Aabtt6670Q] (Appellant) (Respendent)

Section 10Section 12A

VIII. In view of the foregoing discussion, we are of the view that the impugned order dated 29 th November, 2010 passed under Section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Act by learned CIT, Bathinda, is a well order and deserves to be upheld. Accordingly, we uphold the impugned order dated 29 th November, 2010 and dismiss the appeal filed

SHRI MANDEEP SINGH DHILLON,BATHINDA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 300/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar25 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Choudhry, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.300/Asr/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Shri Mandeep Singh Dhillon Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax #16310, Street No. 13/5 Dhillon Bathinda (Punjab). Colony, Barnala Bye Pass, Bathinda.

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Anand, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Prabhjot Kaur, CIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 35A

36,533/- have not been examined. (ii) In the case of husk account, the opening stock has been disclosed at Rs. 14,50,000/- and sales of Rs. 13,77,429/- and loss of Rs. 72,571/-. The detail of sales and opening stock, name and address of the parties to whom the husk was sold and justification of loss