BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “depreciation”+ Section 12A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai261Delhi205Bangalore167Chennai90Ahmedabad89Jaipur53Kolkata40Pune40Lucknow34Chandigarh34Visakhapatnam32Hyderabad24Karnataka22Cuttack18Cochin17Amritsar16Indore14Ranchi7Agra5Nagpur4Rajkot4Patna3Jodhpur2Panaji2Raipur2Dehradun2Surat2Telangana2SC1

Key Topics

Section 12A99Section 1137Section 143(3)30Exemption16Section 14810Section 250(6)7Section 234B7Section 107Charitable Trust7Depreciation

M/S STEP BY STEP JUNIOR SCHOOL SOCIETY,AMRITSAR. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

ITA 596/ASR/2016[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10

depreciation or otherwise in respect of any asset, acquisition of which has been claimed as an application of income under this clause in the same or any other previous year;] 19. From the reading of Section 10(23C) (vi), it is amply clear that the university and educational institution that are solely for educational purposes and not for profit must

TILLA BABA FARID RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR.

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 621/ASR/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Apr 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 621/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2012-13

6
Addition to Income6
Section 2505
For Appellant: Sh. S. K. Kataria (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Rajeev Gubgotra (D.R.)
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 32Section 32(1)

depreciation on the relevant assets was exigible even if the assessee had omitted to charge the same in its accounts. The ld. CIT(A) held that the mandate of section 12A(2

SH. RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 275/ASR/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234BSection 250(6)

2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in holding that the AO has rightly assessed the Appellant in the status of AOP. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in upholding the action of AO in rejecting Appellant

RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 230/ASR/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234BSection 250(6)

2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in holding that the AO has rightly assessed the Appellant in the status of AOP. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in upholding the action of AO in rejecting Appellant

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 161/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234BSection 250(6)

2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in holding that the AO has rightly assessed the Appellant in the status of AOP. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in upholding the action of AO in rejecting Appellant

SH. RAM SHARAN DASS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 103/ASR/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2003-04

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234BSection 250(6)

2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in holding that the AO has rightly assessed the Appellant in the status of AOP. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in upholding the action of AO in rejecting Appellant

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 27/ASR/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234BSection 250(6)

2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in holding that the AO has rightly assessed the Appellant in the status of AOP. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in upholding the action of AO in rejecting Appellant

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- (EXEMPTIONS)), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 162/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234BSection 250(6)

2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in holding that the AO has rightly assessed the Appellant in the status of AOP. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in upholding the action of AO in rejecting Appellant

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- (EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 163/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234BSection 250(6)

2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in holding that the AO has rightly assessed the Appellant in the status of AOP. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in upholding the action of AO in rejecting Appellant

MESERS SHRI SWAMI SHANKARNATH PARVAT CHARITABLE AND WELFARE TRUST ,KAPURTHALA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee appeal is allowed

ITA 602/ASR/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Sept 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 602/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: N.A.

Section 12A

12A the ld. CIT is required to see the objects of the society and not required to examine the application of income which will have to be undertaken by the Assessing Officer on a year to year basis after the assessee files the return of income claiming exemption u/s 11 of the I.T. Act." The said view has also been

M/S. PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 303/ASR/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 250

2. Brief facts of the casesare that for ITA 303 to 306/Asr/2017 are reopened u/s 148 of the Act& assessments were completed u/s 143(3)/147. The issue is common for all cases that is rejection of exemption u/s 11 in connection with withdrawal of registration u/s 12A of the Act. The assessee is established under the Society Registration

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,,JALANDHAR vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 581/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 250

2. Brief facts of the casesare that for ITA 303 to 306/Asr/2017 are reopened u/s 148 of the Act& assessments were completed u/s 143(3)/147. The issue is common for all cases that is rejection of exemption u/s 11 in connection with withdrawal of registration u/s 12A of the Act. The assessee is established under the Society Registration

M/S.PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 306/ASR/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 250

2. Brief facts of the casesare that for ITA 303 to 306/Asr/2017 are reopened u/s 148 of the Act& assessments were completed u/s 143(3)/147. The issue is common for all cases that is rejection of exemption u/s 11 in connection with withdrawal of registration u/s 12A of the Act. The assessee is established under the Society Registration

M/S.PUNJAB INSTITURE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 304/ASR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 250

2. Brief facts of the casesare that for ITA 303 to 306/Asr/2017 are reopened u/s 148 of the Act& assessments were completed u/s 143(3)/147. The issue is common for all cases that is rejection of exemption u/s 11 in connection with withdrawal of registration u/s 12A of the Act. The assessee is established under the Society Registration

M/S.PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 305/ASR/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 250

2. Brief facts of the casesare that for ITA 303 to 306/Asr/2017 are reopened u/s 148 of the Act& assessments were completed u/s 143(3)/147. The issue is common for all cases that is rejection of exemption u/s 11 in connection with withdrawal of registration u/s 12A of the Act. The assessee is established under the Society Registration

M/S GURU RAM DASS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,BATHINDA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 598/ASR/2016[]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar03 Jun 2019

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi. T. A. No. 598/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: N.A.

For Appellant: Sh. Vineet Krishan (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Alok Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 12A

12A on 30.3.2016. The stated aims and objects per the Memorandum of Association (MOA) (PB pgs. 2-9) were duly noted by the competent authority (at para 2 of the impugned order). The same included imparting primary/secondary and higher 2 Guru Ram Dass Educational Society v. CIT(E) education, etc., through opening of schools/colleges and institutions in the backward areas