BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

71 results for “depreciation”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai605Delhi576Chennai202Bangalore197Jaipur148Ahmedabad134Raipur128Hyderabad101Chandigarh77Pune75Amritsar71Kolkata68Indore60Surat50Lucknow42Rajkot32Cochin28Visakhapatnam23Cuttack21Jodhpur14Nagpur11Guwahati9Panaji8Allahabad7Agra6Patna6Ranchi6Dehradun4Jabalpur3Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 14467Addition to Income66Disallowance52Natural Justice49Section 250(6)46Depreciation44Section 153A36Deduction28Section 143(3)23Section 36

SHRI RAJAN BATRA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 138/ASR/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI RAJAN BATRA, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

Showing 1–20 of 71 · Page 1 of 4

23
Section 35A20
Section 80I20
ITA 111/ASR/2022[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
24 May 2023
AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI RAJAN BATRA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 140/ASR/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI RAJAN BATRA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 141/ASR/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI RAJAN BATRA, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 113/ASR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI RAJESH TIWARI,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 85/ASR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHR RAJESH TIWARI,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 81/ASR/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI RAJAN BATRA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 143/ASR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI RAJESH TIWARI,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 82/ASR/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI RAJESH TIWARI,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 83/ASR/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI RAJAN BATRA ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 139/ASR/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI RJAN BATRA,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 137/ASR/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 153BSection 250(6)Section 80

natural justice 12. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.” ITA No. 111/Asr/2022 Revenue’s appeal for AY. 2011-12 Ground of Revenue is reproduced as under: “1. Whether on the facts

SHRI AMRITPAL SINGH (PROP),JALANDHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 1, JALANDHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee ITA No

ITA 425/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 110Section 263Section 54D

natural justice. Notice u/s 142(1] of the l.T Act 1961 is enclosed herewith for compliance. On the fixed date of hearing i.e. 18.11.2016, an application for adjournment* was received and the case was adjourned to 23.11.2016. On 23.11.2016, Sh. J.P. Bhatia A.R. of the assessee attended the office and furnished copy of a/c of Punjab & Sind Bank with detail

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 417/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

natural justice and thus such an order of assessment is vitiated both on fact and in law.” 4. Brief fact of the case is that forassessment years 2001-02 to 2010-11, except AY 2005-06 the revenue and assessee has filed an appeal before us. A chart is reinserted for understanding the better fact of the case. The said

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 293/ASR/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

natural justice and thus such an order of assessment is vitiated both on fact and in law.” 4. Brief fact of the case is that forassessment years 2001-02 to 2010-11, except AY 2005-06 the revenue and assessee has filed an appeal before us. A chart is reinserted for understanding the better fact of the case. The said

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 292/ASR/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

natural justice and thus such an order of assessment is vitiated both on fact and in law.” 4. Brief fact of the case is that forassessment years 2001-02 to 2010-11, except AY 2005-06 the revenue and assessee has filed an appeal before us. A chart is reinserted for understanding the better fact of the case. The said

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 294/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

natural justice and thus such an order of assessment is vitiated both on fact and in law.” 4. Brief fact of the case is that forassessment years 2001-02 to 2010-11, except AY 2005-06 the revenue and assessee has filed an appeal before us. A chart is reinserted for understanding the better fact of the case. The said

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 289/ASR/2015[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2002-03

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

natural justice and thus such an order of assessment is vitiated both on fact and in law.” 4. Brief fact of the case is that forassessment years 2001-02 to 2010-11, except AY 2005-06 the revenue and assessee has filed an appeal before us. A chart is reinserted for understanding the better fact of the case. The said

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 255/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

natural justice and thus such an order of assessment is vitiated both on fact and in law.” 4. Brief fact of the case is that forassessment years 2001-02 to 2010-11, except AY 2005-06 the revenue and assessee has filed an appeal before us. A chart is reinserted for understanding the better fact of the case. The said

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 290/ASR/2015[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2003-04

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

natural justice and thus such an order of assessment is vitiated both on fact and in law.” 4. Brief fact of the case is that forassessment years 2001-02 to 2010-11, except AY 2005-06 the revenue and assessee has filed an appeal before us. A chart is reinserted for understanding the better fact of the case. The said