BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Transfer Pricingclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai289Delhi244Chennai238Kolkata192Bangalore106Hyderabad91Jaipur68Chandigarh68Pune59Ahmedabad54Calcutta38Rajkot25Indore20Surat17Nagpur11Lucknow11SC10Cuttack10Amritsar7Cochin6Varanasi6Karnataka5Visakhapatnam5Dehradun4Jodhpur3Agra3Raipur2Telangana2Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 26316Section 271D8Section 271G6Section 143(3)6Section 269S6Penalty5Addition to Income4Condonation of Delay4Section 92C

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 40/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

delay of 967 days in filing these appeals is hereby condoned and appeals are admitted to be heard on merits. 5. The ld. Pr. CIT has observed that during the course of assessment proceedings in the case of M/s Tirath Ram Badri Nath, Abohar in respect of AY 2008-09, AO has noted that the appellant Sh. Manjit Krishan Malhotra

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

3
Section 54B3
Transfer Pricing3
Disallowance3

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 39/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

delay of 967 days in filing these appeals is hereby condoned and appeals are admitted to be heard on merits. 5. The ld. Pr. CIT has observed that during the course of assessment proceedings in the case of M/s Tirath Ram Badri Nath, Abohar in respect of AY 2008-09, AO has noted that the appellant Sh. Manjit Krishan Malhotra

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 (2), MUKTSAR vs. AJAIB SINGH, VILLAGE BHARU

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 354/ASR/2024[2012]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Jun 2025

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 354/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 2(14)(iii)Section 250Section 54B

condone the delay and admit the appeal to be heard on merits. 3. The grounds of appeal in Form No. 36 are as under: “(i) On the facts & circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting addition of Rs.3,68,15,000/- made on account of long term capital gain on sale of residential land

RAVINDER SINGH BRAR,FARIDKOT, PUNJAB vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, FARIDKOT

In the result, we set aside the appeal back to the files of the Assessing Officer for a limited

ITA 373/ASR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: None
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69A

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing on merits. 5. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed his regular return for the year under appeal disclosing a total income of Rs.13.64 lakhs. It is alleged that the assessee has purchased a residential plot of land during the year under appeal from one M/s Bajwa

M/S GURU NANAK RICE MILLS,NAKODAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

ITA 104/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar05 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Shri Udayan Dasgupta, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.103/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.104/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.105/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/S Guru Nanak Rice Mills Ito बनाम/ Vpo Pandori Khas Nakodar (Punjab) - 144040 Vs. Nakodar (Punjab) - 144040 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadfg-3256-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Ashray Sarna (Ca) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Farat Khan (Cit) – Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04-02-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 05-02-2026 : आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. In These Appeals, The Assessee Assails Confirmation Of Quantum Additions As Well As Confirmation Of Penalty U/S 271G. First, We Take Up Quantum Appeal Ita No.103/Asr/2019 Which Arises Out Of An Order

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Sh. Farat Khan (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 271GSection 92C

delay is minor, the same is condoned and we proceed for adjudication of appeals on merits. 2. In the assessment order for AY 2013-14, Ld. AO has made additions and the assessee, in its grounds of appeal, has challenged confirmation of addition on account of Transfer Pricing

M/S GURU NANAK RICE MILLS,NAKODAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAKODAR

ITA 103/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar05 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Shri Udayan Dasgupta, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.103/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.104/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.105/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/S Guru Nanak Rice Mills Ito बनाम/ Vpo Pandori Khas Nakodar (Punjab) - 144040 Vs. Nakodar (Punjab) - 144040 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadfg-3256-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Ashray Sarna (Ca) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Farat Khan (Cit) – Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04-02-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 05-02-2026 : आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. In These Appeals, The Assessee Assails Confirmation Of Quantum Additions As Well As Confirmation Of Penalty U/S 271G. First, We Take Up Quantum Appeal Ita No.103/Asr/2019 Which Arises Out Of An Order

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Sh. Farat Khan (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 271GSection 92C

delay is minor, the same is condoned and we proceed for adjudication of appeals on merits. 2. In the assessment order for AY 2013-14, Ld. AO has made additions and the assessee, in its grounds of appeal, has challenged confirmation of addition on account of Transfer Pricing

M/S GURU NANAK RICE MILLS,NAKODAR vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAKODAR

ITA 105/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar05 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Shri Udayan Dasgupta, Jm 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.103/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.104/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.105/Asr/2019 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/S Guru Nanak Rice Mills Ito बनाम/ Vpo Pandori Khas Nakodar (Punjab) - 144040 Vs. Nakodar (Punjab) - 144040 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadfg-3256-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Ashray Sarna (Ca) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Farat Khan (Cit) – Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04-02-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 05-02-2026 : आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. In These Appeals, The Assessee Assails Confirmation Of Quantum Additions As Well As Confirmation Of Penalty U/S 271G. First, We Take Up Quantum Appeal Ita No.103/Asr/2019 Which Arises Out Of An Order

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Sh. Farat Khan (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 271GSection 92C

delay is minor, the same is condoned and we proceed for adjudication of appeals on merits. 2. In the assessment order for AY 2013-14, Ld. AO has made additions and the assessee, in its grounds of appeal, has challenged confirmation of addition on account of Transfer Pricing